Delegated updates in epistemic graphs for opponent modelling

Autor(en): Hunter, Anthony
Polberg, Sylwia
Potyka, Nico
Stichwörter: BIPOLAR; Computer Science; Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence; Epistemic argumentation; Epistemic updates; LOGIC; PROBABILISTIC ARGUMENTATION; RANKING; REVISION; SEMANTICS
Erscheinungsdatum: 2019
Herausgeber: ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
Journal: INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF APPROXIMATE REASONING
Volumen: 113
Startseite: 207
Seitenende: 244
Zusammenfassung: 
In an epistemic graph, belief in arguments is represented by probability distributions. Furthermore, the influence that belief in arguments can have on the belief in other arguments is represented by constraints on the probability distributions. Different agents may choose different constraints to describe their reasoning, thus making epistemic graphs extremely flexible tools. A key application for epistemic graphs is modelling participants in persuasion dialogues, with the aim of modelling the change in beliefs as each move in the dialogue is made. This requires mechanisms for updating the model throughout the dialogue. In this paper, we introduce the class of delegated update methods, which harness existing, simpler update methods in order to produce more realistic outputs. In particular, we focus on hypothesized updates, which capture agent's reluctance or susceptibility to belief updates that can be caused by certain factors, such as time of the day, fatigue, dialogue length, and more. We provide a comprehensive range of options for modelling different kinds of agents and we explore a range of properties for categorising the options. (C) 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
ISSN: 0888613X
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijar.2019.07.006

Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric