Acceptance of semipermeable glove liners compared to cotton glove liners in health care workers with work-related skin diseases: Results of a quasi-randomized trial under real workplace conditions

DC ElementWertSprache
dc.contributor.authorHeichel, Theres
dc.contributor.authorBrans, Richard
dc.contributor.authorJohn, Swen Malte
dc.contributor.authorNienhaus, Albert
dc.contributor.authorNordheider, Kathrin
dc.contributor.authorWilke, Annika
dc.contributor.authorSonsmann, Flora K.
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-23T16:13:21Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-23T16:13:21Z-
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn01051873
dc.identifier.urihttps://osnascholar.ub.uni-osnabrueck.de/handle/unios/10530-
dc.description.abstractBackground Glove liners (GLs) made of cotton (COT) are worn under impermeable gloves to prevent occlusion effects. Semipermeable GLs made of Sympatex (SYM) might be an alternative. Objectives To evaluate the acceptance of GLs (COT/SYM) in health care workers (HCWs) with work-related skin diseases (WRSDs). Methods One hundred sixty-one HCWs with WRSDs were asked to wear GLs in combination with occlusive gloves for 10 /- 2 weeks under workplace conditions. A questionnaire was applied to compare acceptance and usability of the respective glove combinations and previously used protective gloves (PUGs). Results A total of 120 data sets were available (SYM: n = 65, 77.4%; COT: n = 55, 71.4%). Both GLs provided a significantly lower sweating sensation, more pleasant climate, comfortable wearing experience, and moist or dry feeling on the skin compared to PUGs. SYM-GLs performed significantly better than COT-GLs regarding mobility of hands, sensitivity, and sense of touch. COT-GLs were significantly better than SYM-GLs in the categories fit, donning and doffing, and material contact. Conclusions Both GLs did not impair work performance, were applicable in various areas of health care activities, and were preferred over PUGs. Our results indicate that SYM-GLs are an alternative to COT-GLs and thus may contribute to current prevention strategies.
dc.description.sponsorshipProjekt DEAL; Open access funding enabled and organized by Projekt DEAL.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWILEY
dc.relation.ispartofCONTACT DERMATITIS
dc.subjectAllergy
dc.subjectBARRIER
dc.subjectCONTACT-DERMATITIS
dc.subjectcotton
dc.subjectDermatology
dc.subjecteczema
dc.subjectEXPOSURE
dc.subjectgloves
dc.subjectHAND ECZEMA
dc.subjecthealth personnel
dc.subjectliners
dc.subjectmembrane
dc.subjectMEMBRANES
dc.subjectocclusion
dc.subjectPREVENTION
dc.subjectprotective
dc.subjectREPAIR
dc.subjectsemipermeable
dc.subjectskin diseases
dc.subjectSympatex
dc.subjectworkplace
dc.titleAcceptance of semipermeable glove liners compared to cotton glove liners in health care workers with work-related skin diseases: Results of a quasi-randomized trial under real workplace conditions
dc.typejournal article
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/cod.13929
dc.identifier.isiISI:000678464600001
dc.description.volume85
dc.description.issue5
dc.description.startpage543
dc.description.endpage553
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-1245-024X
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-6059-7676
dc.identifier.eissn16000536
dc.publisher.place111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
dcterms.isPartOf.abbreviationContact Dermatitis
dcterms.oaStatushybrid
crisitem.author.deptUniversität Osnabrück-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-1245-024X-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-5406-9458-
crisitem.author.netidJoSw269-
Zur Kurzanzeige

Seitenaufrufe

3
Letzte Woche
0
Letzter Monat
0
geprüft am 23.05.2024

Google ScholarTM

Prüfen

Altmetric