Contact allergy to ingredients of hair cosmetics - a comparison of female hairdressers and clients based on IVDK 2007-2012 data

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorUter, Wolfgang
dc.contributor.authorGefeller, Olaf
dc.contributor.authorJohn, Swen Malte
dc.contributor.authorSchnuch, Axel
dc.contributor.authorGeier, Johannes
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-23T16:14:13Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-23T16:14:13Z-
dc.date.issued2014
dc.identifier.issn01051873
dc.identifier.urihttps://osnascholar.ub.uni-osnabrueck.de/handle/unios/10966-
dc.description.abstractBackground. Cosmetics for bleaching, waving/relaxing and dyeing hair contain well-known allergens, leading to a substantial number of cases of allergic contact dermatitis. Objective. To compare the frequency of important contact allergens (i) between two distinct groups of exposed patients, and (ii) with previous surveillance data. Methods. On the basis of data collected by the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK; www.ivkd.org) between 2007 and 2012 in 824 female hairdressers and 2067 female clients, the current spectrum of contact sensitization to ingredients of hair cosmetics, as contained in different pertinent series, is described. Results. A similar burden of sensitization as in previous analyses was observed, but with some increase in sensitization to oxidative hair dye components in clients. Some allergens mainly affected hairdressers, such as ammonium persulfate (18.7% positive) and glyceryl monothioglycolate (GMTG; still 4.7% positive, with a few cases also in young hairdressers, despite removal from the German market). Conclusions. Hair dyes remain important contact allergens, despite various attempts by the cosmetic industry to introduce hair dyes with lower allergenic potential. The re-emergence of GMTG as an occupational allergen should be considered as a warning signal ('sentinel event') prompting close monitoring.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWILEY-BLACKWELL
dc.relation.ispartofCONTACT DERMATITIS
dc.subjectAllergy
dc.subjectconsumer protection
dc.subjectcontact allergy
dc.subjectDEPARTMENTS
dc.subjectDermatology
dc.subjecthair cosmetics
dc.subjectINFORMATION NETWORK
dc.subjectoccupational dermatitis
dc.subjectP-PHENYLENEDIAMINE
dc.subjectSENSITIZATION
dc.titleContact allergy to ingredients of hair cosmetics - a comparison of female hairdressers and clients based on IVDK 2007-2012 data
dc.typejournal article
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/cod.12196
dc.identifier.isiISI:000339724800002
dc.description.volume71
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.startpage13
dc.description.endpage20
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-8985-7582
dc.contributor.researcheridW-9604-2019
dc.identifier.eissn16000536
dc.publisher.place111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
dcterms.isPartOf.abbreviationContact Dermatitis
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-5406-9458-
crisitem.author.netidJoSw269-
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

5
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on May 18, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric