Ways to Go: Men's and Women's Support for Aggressive and Nonaggressive Confrontation of Sexism as a Function of Gender Identification

Autor(en): Becker, Julia C.
Barreto, Manuela 
Stichwörter: BIAS; MOTIVATION; PREJUDICE; Psychology; Psychology, Social; RACISM; RESPONSES; SELF; SOCIAL COSTS; Social Issues
Erscheinungsdatum: 2014
Herausgeber: WILEY-BLACKWELL
Journal: JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ISSUES
Volumen: 70
Ausgabe: 4, SI
Startseite: 668
Seitenende: 686
Zusammenfassung: 
This research examines male and female perceivers' reactions to a female target who (1) confronted sexism nonaggressively, (2) confronted sexism aggressively (by slapping the perpetrator), or (3) did not confront sexism. Results (N = 152) indicated that, overall, both women and men responded most favorably to the female target who confronted nonaggressively. Nonaggressive confrontation was perceived as relatively unthreatening for women and relatively threatening for men, whereas the remaining responses were all perceived as threatening for women. Results were further moderated by participants' a priori levels of gender identification: women who were weakly identified with their gender and men who were highly identified with their gender were less supportive of aggressive confrontations. Implications regarding the optimal way to confront sexism are discussed.
ISSN: 00224537
DOI: 10.1111/josi.12085

Show full item record

Page view(s)

7
Last Week
0
Last month
1
checked on Feb 23, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric