Social learning and water resources management

DC ElementWertSprache
dc.contributor.authorPahl-Wostl, Claudia
dc.contributor.authorCraps, Marc
dc.contributor.authorDewulf, Art
dc.contributor.authorMostert, Erik
dc.contributor.authorTabara, David
dc.contributor.authorTaillieu, Tharsi
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-23T16:17:42Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-23T16:17:42Z-
dc.date.issued2007
dc.identifier.issn17083087
dc.identifier.urihttps://osnascholar.ub.uni-osnabrueck.de/handle/unios/12374-
dc.description.abstractNatural resources management in general, and water resources management in particular, are currently undergoing a major paradigm shift. Management practices have largely been developed and implemented by experts using technical means based on designing systems that can be predicted and controlled. In recent years, stakeholder involvement has gained increasing importance. Collaborative governance is considered to be more appropriate for integrated and adaptive management regimes needed to cope with the complexity of social-ecological systems. The paper presents a concept for social learning and collaborative governance developed in the European project HarmoniCOP ( Harmonizing COllaborative Planning). The concept is rooted in the more interpretive strands of the social sciences emphasizing the context dependence of knowledge. The role of frames and boundary management in processes of learning at different levels and time scales is investigated. The foundation of social learning as investigated in the HarmoniCOP project is multiparty collaboration processes that are perceived to be the nuclei of learning processes. Such processes take place in networks or ``communities of practice'' and are influenced by the governance structure in which they are embedded. Requirements for social learning include institutional settings that guarantee some degree of stability and certainty without being rigid and inflexible. Our analyses, which are based on conceptual considerations and empirical insights, suggest that the development of such institutional settings involves continued processes of social learning. In these processes, stakeholders at different scales are connected in flexible networks that allow them to develop the capacity and trust they need to collaborate in a wide range of formal and informal relationships ranging from formal legal structures and contracts to informal, voluntary agreements.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherRESILIENCE ALLIANCE
dc.relation.ispartofECOLOGY AND SOCIETY
dc.subjectACTORS
dc.subjectADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT
dc.subjectCLIMATE
dc.subjectCOLLABORATION
dc.subjectcollaborative governance
dc.subjectCOMPLEXITY
dc.subjectDISTRIBUTED LEADERSHIP
dc.subjectEcology
dc.subjectEnvironmental Sciences & Ecology
dc.subjectEnvironmental Studies
dc.subjectISSUES
dc.subjectNATURAL-RESOURCES
dc.subjectRIVER-BASIN MANAGEMENT
dc.subjectsocial learning
dc.subjectTRANSITIONS
dc.subjectwater resources
dc.titleSocial learning and water resources management
dc.typejournal article
dc.identifier.isiISI:000252310900007
dc.description.volume12
dc.description.issue2
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-9546-0522
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-4171-7644
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-6835-5287
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-4171-7644
dc.contributor.researcheridL-2711-2014
dc.contributor.researcheridC-1271-2010
dc.contributor.researcheridAAA-6223-2020
dc.contributor.researcheridABA-7434-2020
dc.publisher.placeACADIA UNIV, BIOLOGY DEPT, WOLFVILLE, NS B0P 1X0, CANADA
dcterms.isPartOf.abbreviationEcol. Soc.
crisitem.author.deptInstitut für Umweltsystemforschung-
crisitem.author.deptidresearchcenter5-
crisitem.author.parentorgUniversität Osnabrück-
crisitem.author.netidPaCl441-
Zur Kurzanzeige

Google ScholarTM

Prüfen