Effectiveness of secondary prevention in metalworkers with work-related skin diseases and comparison with participants of a tertiary prevention program: A prospective cohort study

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBrans, Richard
dc.contributor.authorWilke, Annika
dc.contributor.authorRodriguez, Elke
dc.contributor.authorBoraczynski, Nicole
dc.contributor.authorWeidinger, Stephan
dc.contributor.authorReich, Anna
dc.contributor.authorGeier, Johannes
dc.contributor.authorSchoen, Michael P.
dc.contributor.authorSkudlik, Christoph
dc.contributor.authorJohn, Swen M.
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-23T16:18:44Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-23T16:18:44Z-
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn01051873
dc.identifier.urihttps://osnascholar.ub.uni-osnabrueck.de/handle/unios/12823-
dc.description.abstractBackground In Germany, a multistep approach has been established to prevent work-related skin diseases (WRSDs). Objectives To evaluate the effect of a secondary individual prevention program (SIP) in metalworkers with WRSD and to compare their characteristics with those of participants of a tertiary individual prevention program (TIP). Patients and Methods In a prospective cohort study, metalworkers with WRSD of the hands participating either in the SIP (n = 114) or in the TIP (n = 83) were recruited. At baseline and at the respective follow-up 8-12 weeks after the SIP or at dismissal from the TIP (3-4 weeks later), questionnaires were completed and the severity of WRSD was assessed. Saliva samples were collected for assessment of filaggrin (FLG) mutations and an explorative genome-wide association study (GWAS). Results Ninety-three SIP patients (81.6%) attended the follow-up. Disease severity was significantly reduced, and knowledge and protective behavior were significantly improved compared to baseline. Significant differences between SIP and TIP patients were found regarding duration and severity of symptoms, work absenteeism, tobacco smoking, and presence of atopic dermatitis, but not regardingFLGmutations and by GWAS. Conclusions The SIP was effective in metalworkers with WRSDs. Individual factors may influence the course of the disease and the need for the TIP.
dc.description.sponsorshipVolkswagen Foundation (Niedersachsisches Vorab) [ZN2778]; The study was funded by the Volkswagen Foundation (Niedersachsisches Vorab ZN2778).
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWILEY
dc.relation.ispartofCONTACT DERMATITIS
dc.subject1-YEAR FOLLOW-UP
dc.subjectAllergy
dc.subjectATOPIC-DERMATITIS
dc.subjectcontact dermatitis
dc.subjectCONTACT-DERMATITIS
dc.subjectDermatology
dc.subjectfilaggrin
dc.subjecthand eczema
dc.subjecthealth education
dc.subjectINDIVIDUAL PREVENTION
dc.subjectmetalworker
dc.subjectoccupational
dc.subjectOCCUPATIONAL HAND ECZEMA
dc.subjectOF-FUNCTION MUTATIONS
dc.subjectprevention
dc.subjectQUALITY-ASSURANCE
dc.subjectRISK-FACTORS
dc.subjectSEVERITY INDEX
dc.subjecttobacco
dc.subjectTOBACCO SMOKING
dc.subjectwork-related
dc.titleEffectiveness of secondary prevention in metalworkers with work-related skin diseases and comparison with participants of a tertiary prevention program: A prospective cohort study
dc.typejournal article
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/cod.13682
dc.identifier.isiISI:000563981200001
dc.description.volume83
dc.description.issue6
dc.description.startpage497
dc.description.endpage506
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-1245-024X
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-3692-3950
dc.identifier.eissn16000536
dc.publisher.place111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
dcterms.isPartOf.abbreviationContact Dermatitis
dcterms.oaStatushybrid
crisitem.author.deptUniversität Osnabrück-
crisitem.author.deptUniversität Osnabrück-
crisitem.author.deptUniversität Osnabrück-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-1245-024X-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-5406-9458-
crisitem.author.netidJoSw269-
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

3
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on May 20, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric