Beyond Allyship: Motivations for Advantaged Group Members to Engage in Action for Disadvantaged Groups

DC ElementWertSprache
dc.contributor.authorRadke, Helena R. M.
dc.contributor.authorKutlaca, Maja
dc.contributor.authorSiem, Birte
dc.contributor.authorWright, Stephen C.
dc.contributor.authorBecker, Julia C.
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-23T16:21:24Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-23T16:21:24Z-
dc.date.issued2020
dc.identifier.issn10888683
dc.identifier.urihttps://osnascholar.ub.uni-osnabrueck.de/handle/unios/13854-
dc.description.abstractWhite Americans who participate in the Black Lives Matter movement, men who attended the Women's March, and people from the Global North who work to reduce poverty in the Global South-advantaged group members (sometimes referred to as allies) often engage in action for disadvantaged groups. Tensions can arise, however, over the inclusion of advantaged group members in these movements, which we argue can partly be explained by their motivations to participate. We propose that advantaged group members can be motivated to participate in these movements (a) to improve the status of the disadvantaged group, (b) on the condition that the status of their own group is maintained, (c) to meet their own personal needs, and (d) because this behavior aligns with their moral beliefs. We identify potential antecedents and behavioral outcomes associated with these motivations before describing the theoretical contribution our article makes to the psychological literature.
dc.description.sponsorshipDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation)German Research Foundation (DFG) [DFG BE 4648/4-1]; The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This research was funded by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation; DFG BE 4648/4-1).
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
dc.relation.ispartofPERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW
dc.subjectACTION TENDENCIES
dc.subjectallies
dc.subjectAMBIVALENT SEXISM
dc.subjectCOLLECTIVE ACTION
dc.subjectGROUP-BASED GUILT
dc.subjectHELPING-BEHAVIOR
dc.subjectIDENTITY-MODEL
dc.subjectmotivations
dc.subjectPRIVILEGE AWARENESS
dc.subjectprotest
dc.subjectPsychology
dc.subjectPsychology, Social
dc.subjectSELF-CATEGORIZATION
dc.subjectsocial change
dc.subjectSOCIAL-DOMINANCE ORIENTATION
dc.subjectSTATUS STABILITY
dc.titleBeyond Allyship: Motivations for Advantaged Group Members to Engage in Action for Disadvantaged Groups
dc.typereview
dc.identifier.doi10.1177/1088868320918698
dc.identifier.isiISI:000532358500001
dc.description.volume24
dc.description.issue4
dc.description.startpage291
dc.description.endpage315
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-2456-1174
dc.contributor.researcheridAAR-4601-2021
dc.identifier.eissn15327957
dc.publisher.place2455 TELLER RD, THOUSAND OAKS, CA 91320 USA
dcterms.isPartOf.abbreviationPers. Soc. Psychol. Rev.
dcterms.oaStatusGreen Accepted, Green Published, hybrid
Zur Kurzanzeige

Seitenaufrufe

4
Letzte Woche
0
Letzter Monat
0
geprüft am 01.06.2024

Google ScholarTM

Prüfen

Altmetric