Same room-different windows? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the relationship between self-report and neuropsychological tests of cognitive flexibility in healthy adults
DC Element | Wert | Sprache |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Howlett, Caitlin A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Wewege, Michael A. | |
dc.contributor.author | Berryman, Carolyn | |
dc.contributor.author | Oldach, Annika | |
dc.contributor.author | Jennings, Elizabeth | |
dc.contributor.author | Moore, Emily | |
dc.contributor.author | Karran, Emma L. | |
dc.contributor.author | Szeto, Kimberley | |
dc.contributor.author | Pronk, Leander | |
dc.contributor.author | Miles, Stephanie | |
dc.contributor.author | Moseley, G. Lorimer | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-12-23T16:22:16Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-12-23T16:22:16Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 02727358 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://osnascholar.ub.uni-osnabrueck.de/handle/unios/14238 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Cognitive flexibility can be thought of as the ability to effectively adapt one's cognitive and behavioural strategies in response to changing task or environmental demands. To substantiate the common inference that selfreport and neuropsychological tests of cognitive flexibility provide `different windows into the same room', we undertook a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine whether self-report and neuropsychological tests of cognitive flexibility are related in healthy adults. Ten databases and relevant grey literature were searched from inception. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines were adhered to. Twenty-one articles satisfied our inclusion criteria. A multi-level random-effects meta-analysis revealed no relationship (0.05, 95% CI = -0.00 to 0.10). Random-effects meta-analyses raised the possibility that the Cognitive Flexibility Scale and the Trail Making Test - part B (time) may be related (0.19, 95% CI = 0.06 to 0.31). We conclude that the relationship between self-report and neuropsychological tests of cognitive flexibility is not large enough to be considered convincing evidence for the two assessment approaches sharing construct validity. These results have clear implications for assessing and interpreting cognitive flexibility research and clinical practice. | |
dc.description.sponsorship | Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) scholarships; National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC)National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1127155]; NHMRCNational Health and Medical Research Council of Australia; University of New South Wales; Neuroscience Research Australia; NHMRC Leadership Investigator GrantNational Health and Medical Research Council of Australia [1178444]; Lifetime Support Authority of South Australia; CAH and SM were recipients of Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) scholarships. CB was supported by a National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Early Career Fellowship [ID 1127155]. MAW was supported by a Postgraduate Scholarship from the NHMRC, a School of Medical Sciences Top-Up Scholarship from the University of New South Wales, and a PhD Top-Up Scholarship from Neuroscience Research Australia. GLM and EM were supported by a NHMRC Leadership Investigator Grant [ID 1178444] to GLM. EK was supported by a project grant from Lifetime Support Authority of South Australia. These funding bodies had no role in the study design, collection, analysis or interpretation of the data, writing of the manuscript, or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication. | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD | |
dc.relation.ispartof | CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW | |
dc.subject | ACCEPTANCE | |
dc.subject | ANOREXIA-NERVOSA | |
dc.subject | AUTISM SPECTRUM DISORDER | |
dc.subject | CHRONIC PAIN | |
dc.subject | Cognitive flexibility | |
dc.subject | Correlation | |
dc.subject | EXECUTIVE FUNCTION | |
dc.subject | FRONTAL-LOBE | |
dc.subject | Healthy adults | |
dc.subject | Neuropsychological test | |
dc.subject | PERFORMANCE | |
dc.subject | Psychology | |
dc.subject | Psychology, Clinical | |
dc.subject | RELIABILITY | |
dc.subject | SAMPLE | |
dc.subject | Self-report test | |
dc.subject | Systematic review | |
dc.subject | TRAUMATIC BRAIN-INJURY | |
dc.title | Same room-different windows? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the relationship between self-report and neuropsychological tests of cognitive flexibility in healthy adults | |
dc.type | review | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102061 | |
dc.identifier.isi | ISI:000686790200001 | |
dc.description.volume | 88 | |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0001-9469-9139 | |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0002-6088-8289 | |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0002-3750-4945 | |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0002-4584-8641 | |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0001-8190-894X | |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0002-5316-0847 | |
dc.contributor.researcherid | A-7095-2009 | |
dc.contributor.researcherid | E-7917-2015 | |
dc.identifier.eissn | 18737811 | |
dc.publisher.place | THE BOULEVARD, LANGFORD LANE, KIDLINGTON, OXFORD OX5 1GB, ENGLAND | |
dcterms.isPartOf.abbreviation | Clin. Psychol. Rev. |
Seitenaufrufe
11
Letzte Woche
0
0
Letzter Monat
0
0
geprüft am 07.06.2024