Impacts of invasive plant species on riparian plant assemblages: interactions with elevated atmospheric carbon dioxide and nitrogen deposition

Autor(en): Bradford, Mark A.
Schumacher, Henry B.
Catovsky, Sebastian
Eggers, Till
Newingtion, John E.
Tordoff, George M.
Stichwörter: C-4 GRASSES; CO2; COMMUNITIES; COMPETITION; DYNAMICS; Ecology; Environmental Sciences & Ecology; exotic species; Fallopia japonica; global change; Impatiens glandulifera; INVASIBILITY; PRODUCTIVITY; RESPONSES; SUCCESS; SUPPORT
Erscheinungsdatum: 2007
Herausgeber: SPRINGER
Journal: OECOLOGIA
Volumen: 152
Ausgabe: 4
Startseite: 791
Seitenende: 803
Zusammenfassung: 
Resource competition is commonly invoked to explain negative effects of invasive plants on native plant abundance. If invasives out-compete natives, global changes that elevate resource availability may interact with invasives to exacerbate impacts on native communities. Indeed, evidence is accumulating that elevated CO2 and N deposition decrease native biomass and simultaneously increase invasive biomass. However, superior competitive ability, and a relative increase in the magnitude of invasive impacts under elevated resource availability, remain to be definitively proven. Using model, multi-species, multi-individual riparian plant communities, where planting density was maintained by replacement of native with exotic individuals, we conducted a greenhouse, competition experiment using native (to the UK) and invaded communities exposed to ambient and elevated CO2 (CO2 experiment) or N availability (N experiment). We tested two hypotheses: (1) invasives are superior competitors to natives at ambient atmospheric CO2 and N deposition; (2) negative effects of invasives on natives are exacerbated under elevated CO2 or N availability. Our results provide some support for the first hypothesis: in the CO2 experiment native biomass was significantly lower in invaded communities. In the N experiment, native biomass was unaffected by the presence of exotics but other characteristics (e.g. root:shoot ratios) were altered. Differences in light availability between the experiments may have modified the effects of the invasives on the native assemblages but our design did not permit us to determine this definitively. The hypothesis that elevated CO2 and N availability benefit invasives at the expense of natives was not supported by our results. This may be explained either because the invasives showed minor responses to the resource manipulations or because native and exotic species were differentially limited by CO2 and N. Our results confirm the expectation that invasives alter the characteristics of native assemblages but lead us to question whether elevated resource availability will magnify these effects.
ISSN: 00298549
DOI: 10.1007/s00442-007-0697-z

Zur Langanzeige

Seitenaufrufe

2
Letzte Woche
0
Letzter Monat
0
geprüft am 29.05.2024

Google ScholarTM

Prüfen

Altmetric