Multicentre study for the development of an in vivo model to evaluate the influence of topical formulations on irritation

DC ElementWertSprache
dc.contributor.authorSchnetz, E
dc.contributor.authorDiepgen, TL
dc.contributor.authorElsner, P
dc.contributor.authorFrosch, PJ
dc.contributor.authorKlotz, AJ
dc.contributor.authorKresken, J
dc.contributor.authorKuss, O
dc.contributor.authorMerk, H
dc.contributor.authorSchwanitz, HJ
dc.contributor.authorWigger-Alberti, W
dc.contributor.authorFartasch, M
dc.contributor.authorStudy Grp Skin Protect Soc Occupat
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-23T16:23:21Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-23T16:23:21Z-
dc.date.issued2000
dc.identifier.issn01051873
dc.identifier.urihttps://osnascholar.ub.uni-osnabrueck.de/handle/unios/14507-
dc.description.abstractAlthough skin protective products to prevent irritant skin reactions are in wide use, neither standardized test models to prove differences in efficacy exist, nor has the quality or the reproducibility of results been evaluated in a multicentre approach. This should be mandatory when developing or testing skin care products. Therefore, we have designed a multicentre study in an approach to find a standardized test procedure for the evaluation of skin protective products. In this irritation study, a repeated short-time occlusive irritation test (ROIT) with a standardized protocol has been evaluated in 2 phases (12 days and 5 days protocol) in 4 (n=20) respectively 6 (n=33) skilled centres. The skin reaction was induced by 2 irritants (0.5% aq. SLS and toluene, 2x a day for 30 min). Its modification by 3 different cream bases with different hydrophilicity was analyzed. The irritation was monitored by bioengineering methods (TEWL measurement, colorimetry) and by clinical scoring. The evaluation showed that significant results could already be achieved with the 5-day protocol. Furthermore, in spite of the expected inter-centre variations due to heterogeneity of the individual threshold of irritation, interpretation of clinical score, and inter-instrumental variability, the ranking of the vehicles regarding reduction of the irritant reaction was consistent in all centres.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherMUNKSGAARD INT PUBL LTD
dc.relation.ispartofCONTACT DERMATITIS
dc.subjectAllergy
dc.subjectBIOENGINEERING METHODS
dc.subjectclinical score
dc.subjectcolorimetry
dc.subjectDermatology
dc.subjectEPIDERMAL WATER-LOSS
dc.subjectEUROPEAN-SOCIETY
dc.subjectin vivo
dc.subjectIN-VIVO
dc.subjectmulticentre
dc.subjectOF-CONTACT-DERMATITIS
dc.subjectprevention of irritation
dc.subjectPROTECTIVE CREAMS
dc.subjectSKIN BARRIER CREAMS
dc.subjectSODIUM LAURYL SULFATE
dc.subjectSTANDARDIZATION-GROUP
dc.subjectTEST RIT
dc.subjectTEWL
dc.subjectvisual assessment
dc.titleMulticentre study for the development of an in vivo model to evaluate the influence of topical formulations on irritation
dc.typejournal article
dc.identifier.doi10.1034/j.1600-0536.2000.042006336.x
dc.identifier.isiISI:000087620700005
dc.description.volume42
dc.description.issue6
dc.description.startpage336
dc.description.endpage343
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-3301-5869
dc.publisher.place35 NORRE SOGADE, PO BOX 2148, DK-1016 COPENHAGEN, DENMARK
dcterms.isPartOf.abbreviationContact Dermatitis
Zur Kurzanzeige

Seitenaufrufe

5
Letzte Woche
0
Letzter Monat
0
geprüft am 23.05.2024

Google ScholarTM

Prüfen

Altmetric