A negative breakdown test in a fragrance mix I-positive patient does not rule out contact allergy to its fragrance constituents

DC ElementWertSprache
dc.contributor.authorGeier, Johannes
dc.contributor.authorSchubert, Steffen
dc.contributor.authorSchnuch, Axel
dc.contributor.authorSzliska, Christiane
dc.contributor.authorWeisshaar, Elke
dc.contributor.authorKraenke, Birger
dc.contributor.authorWerfel, Thomas
dc.contributor.authorRueff, Franziska
dc.contributor.authorSchroeder-Kraft, Claudia
dc.contributor.authorBuhl, Timo
dc.contributor.authorInformation Network Departments De
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-23T16:23:28Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-23T16:23:28Z-
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn01051873
dc.identifier.urihttps://osnascholar.ub.uni-osnabrueck.de/handle/unios/14549-
dc.description.abstractBackground In about half of the patients reacting positive to fragrance mix I (FM I), breakdown testing remains negative. This raises the question of whether the reaction to FM I is false-positive, or the breakdown test is false-negative. Objectives To identify characteristics and sensitization patterns of patients positive to FM I, but not to its fragrance constituents. Patients and Methods Retrospective analysis of data from the Information Network of Departments of Dermatology (IVDK) between 2005 and 2019. Three patient groups were defined according to their reaction pattern: Group I, FM I positive and >= 1 single fragrance positive in the breakdown test (n = 1912); Group II, FM I positive and breakdown test negative (n = 1318); Group III, FM I negative (n = 19 790). Results Regarding the pattern of concomitant reactions to other fragrances, Group II had an intermediate position between Group I and Group III. In other respects (age and sex distribution, frequency of sensitization to non-fragrance baseline series allergens), Group II rather resembled Group I. Conclusions Not every positive reaction to FM I in patients with negative breakdown tests is false-positive. There may be false-negative reactions to the single fragrance components when patch tested at 1% pet. Raising patch concentrations of some single fragrances is recommended.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherWILEY
dc.relation.ispartofCONTACT DERMATITIS
dc.subjectAllergy
dc.subjectamyl cinnamal
dc.subjectbreakdown test
dc.subjectclinical epidemiology
dc.subjectDermatology
dc.subjecteugenol
dc.subjectfragrance allergy
dc.subjectfragrance mix I
dc.subjectgeraniol
dc.subjectpatch test concentration
dc.subjectpatch testing
dc.titleA negative breakdown test in a fragrance mix I-positive patient does not rule out contact allergy to its fragrance constituents
dc.typejournal article
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/cod.13803
dc.identifier.isiISI:000623679000001
dc.description.volume84
dc.description.issue6
dc.description.startpage407
dc.description.endpage418
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-5725-7734
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-2017-8469
dc.identifier.eissn16000536
dc.publisher.place111 RIVER ST, HOBOKEN 07030-5774, NJ USA
dcterms.isPartOf.abbreviationContact Dermatitis
dcterms.oaStatushybrid
Zur Kurzanzeige

Seitenaufrufe

11
Letzte Woche
0
Letzter Monat
0
geprüft am 19.05.2024

Google ScholarTM

Prüfen

Altmetric