Cross-Comparison of Climate Change Adaptation Strategies Across Large River Basins in Europe, Africa and Asia

DC ElementWertSprache
dc.contributor.authorKrysanova, Valentina
dc.contributor.authorDickens, Chris
dc.contributor.authorTimmerman, Jos
dc.contributor.authorVarela-Ortega, Consuelo
dc.contributor.authorSchlueter, Maja
dc.contributor.authorRoest, Koen
dc.contributor.authorHuntjens, Patrick
dc.contributor.authorJaspers, Fons
dc.contributor.authorBuiteveld, Hendrik
dc.contributor.authorMoreno, Edinson
dc.contributor.authorCarrera, Javier de Pedraza
dc.contributor.authorSlamova, Romana
dc.contributor.authorMartinkova, Marta
dc.contributor.authorBlanco, Irene
dc.contributor.authorEsteve, Paloma
dc.contributor.authorPringle, Kate
dc.contributor.authorPahl-Wostl, Claudia
dc.contributor.authorKabat, Pavel
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-23T16:23:45Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-23T16:23:45Z-
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.issn09204741
dc.identifier.urihttps://osnascholar.ub.uni-osnabrueck.de/handle/unios/14648-
dc.description.abstractA cross-comparison of climate change adaptation strategies across regions was performed, considering six large river basins as case study areas. Three of the basins, namely the Elbe, Guadiana, and Rhine, are located in Europe, the Nile Equatorial Lakes region and the Orange basin are in Africa, and the Amudarya basin is in Central Asia. The evaluation was based mainly on the opinions of policy makers and water management experts in the river basins. The adaptation strategies were evaluated considering the following issues: expected climate change, expected climate change impacts, drivers for development of adaptation strategy, barriers for adaptation, state of the implementation of a range of water management measures, and status of adaptation strategy implementation. The analysis of responses and cross-comparison were performed with rating the responses where possible. According to the expert opinions, there is an understanding in all six regions that climate change is happening. Different climate change impacts are expected in the basins, whereas decreasing annual water availability, and increasing frequency and intensity of droughts (and to a lesser extent floods) are expected in all of them. According to the responses, the two most important drivers for development of adaptation strategy are: climate-related disasters, and national and international policies. The following most important barriers for adaptation to climate change were identified by responders: spatial and temporal uncertainties in climate projections, lack of adequate financial resources, and lack of horizontal cooperation. The evaluated water resources management measures are on a relatively high level in the Elbe and Rhine basins, followed by the Orange and Guadiana. It is lower in the Amudarya basin, and the lowest in the NEL region, where many measures are only at the planning stage. Regarding the level of adaptation strategy implementation, it can be concluded that the adaptation to climate change has started in all basins, but progresses rather slowly.
dc.description.sponsorshipNeWater project: New approaches to Adaptive Water Management under Uncertainty [511179]; The study was performed in the framework of NeWater project: New approaches to Adaptive Water Management under Uncertainty, contract No. 511179. The authors are very grateful to all 71 respondents participated in the survey. The contributions and support of the following persons is especially appreciated: Jens Weinelt, Andre Savitsky, Raisa Toryannikova, and Darya Hirsch (Amudarya basin); Sven Schulz, Sabine Mollenkamp, Arnost Kult, Pavel Eckhardt, Petr Bouska, Jiri Jungr, Ladislav Kasparek and Zdenek Kos (Elbe basin); Gema Carmona, Jose Angel Rodriguez Cabello, Ana Iglesias, Nuria Hernandez-Mora, Alberto Fernandez-Lop and Pedro Zorrilla (Guadiana basin); Fulco Ludwig (NEL region); Ditiro Moalafhi, Piet Heyns, Motsomi Maletjane, Chris Moseki and Tshilidzi Dlamini (Orange basin); Erik van Slobbe (Rhine basin), and Caroline Sullivan (NeWater). Technical support was provided by Shaochun Huang, Christian Siderius and Sona Nemeckova.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSPRINGER
dc.relation.ispartofWATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT
dc.subjectAdaptation to climate change
dc.subjectADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT
dc.subjectAmudarya
dc.subjectBarrier
dc.subjectClimate change
dc.subjectDriver
dc.subjectElbe, Guadiana
dc.subjectEngineering
dc.subjectEngineering, Civil
dc.subjectIMPACT
dc.subjectNile Equatorial Lakes region
dc.subjectOrange
dc.subjectQuestionnaire
dc.subjectREGIMES
dc.subjectRhine
dc.subjectRISK
dc.subjectRiver basin
dc.subjectWater management
dc.subjectWater Resources
dc.subjectWATER-RESOURCES MANAGEMENT
dc.titleCross-Comparison of Climate Change Adaptation Strategies Across Large River Basins in Europe, Africa and Asia
dc.typejournal article
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s11269-010-9650-8
dc.identifier.isiISI:000282585800018
dc.description.volume24
dc.description.issue14
dc.description.startpage4121
dc.description.endpage4160
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-1216-9156
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-3421-2103
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-8466-7512
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-4251-7767
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-6105-3339
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-7253-0209
dc.contributor.researcheridY-6746-2019
dc.contributor.researcheridAAR-8238-2021
dc.contributor.researcheridJ-7976-2017
dc.contributor.researcheridAAR-2324-2020
dc.contributor.researcheridAAJ-2245-2020
dc.contributor.researcheridP-7379-2019
dc.contributor.researcheridA-4665-2013
dc.contributor.researcheridAAX-8798-2020
dc.identifier.eissn15731650
dc.publisher.placeVAN GODEWIJCKSTRAAT 30, 3311 GZ DORDRECHT, NETHERLANDS
dcterms.isPartOf.abbreviationWater Resour. Manag.
dcterms.oaStatusGreen Accepted
crisitem.author.deptInstitut für Umweltsystemforschung-
crisitem.author.deptidresearchcenter5-
crisitem.author.parentorgUniversität Osnabrück-
crisitem.author.netidPaCl441-
Zur Kurzanzeige

Seitenaufrufe

1
Letzte Woche
0
Letzter Monat
0
geprüft am 02.06.2024

Google ScholarTM

Prüfen

Altmetric