International guidelines for the in vivo assessment of skin properties in non-clinical settings: Part 2. transepidermal water loss and skin hydration

Autor(en): du Plessis, Johan
Stefaniak, Aleksandr
Eloff, Fritz
John, Swen 
Agner, Tove
Chou, Tzu-Chieh
Nixon, Rosemary
Steiner, Markus
Franken, Anja
Kudla, Irena
Holness, Linn
Stichwörter: BARRIER FUNCTION; BIOENGINEERING METHODS; BIOPHYSICAL PARAMETERS; CLOSED-CHAMBER; Dermatology; guideline; INDUCED CUTANEOUS IRRITATION; non-clinical; OF-CONTACT-DERMATITIS; skin barrier; skin hydration; SLIGHTLY DAMAGED SKIN; STANDARDIZATION-GROUP; stratum corneum; STRATUM-CORNEUM HYDRATION; SURFACE-PROPERTIES; transepidermal water loss
Erscheinungsdatum: 2013
Herausgeber: WILEY
Enthalten in: SKIN RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY
Band: 19
Ausgabe: 3
Startseite: 265
Seitenende: 278
Zusammenfassung: 
Background: There is an emerging perspective that it is not sufficient to just assess skin exposure to physical and chemical stressors in workplaces, but that it is also important to assess the condition, i.e. skin barrier function of the exposed skin at the time of exposure. The workplace environment, representing a non-clinical environment, can be highly variable and difficult to control, thereby presenting unique measurement challenges not typically encountered in clinical settings. Methods: An expert working group convened a workshop as part of the 5th International Conference on Occupational and Environmental Exposure of Skin to Chemicals (OEESC) to develop basic guidelines and best practices (based on existing clinical guidelines, published data, and own experiences) for the in vivo measurement of transepidermal water loss (TEWL) and skin hydration in non-clinical settings with specific reference to the workplace as a worst-case scenario. Results: Key elements of these guidelines are: (i) to minimize or recognize, to the extent feasible, the influences of relevant endogenous-, exogenous-, environmental- and measurement/instrumentation-related factors; (ii) to measure TEWL with a closed-chamber type instrument; (iii) report results as a difference or percent change (rather than absolute values); and (iv) accurately report any notable deviations from this guidelines. Conclusion: It is anticipated that these guidelines will promote consistent data reporting, which will facilitate inter-comparison of study results.
ISSN: 0909752X
DOI: 10.1111/srt.12037

Zur Langanzeige

Seitenaufrufe

3
Letzte Woche
0
Letzter Monat
1
geprüft am 06.06.2024

Google ScholarTM

Prüfen

Altmetric