What Do National Flags Stand for? An Exploration of Associations Across 11 Countries

Autor(en): Becker, Julia C.
Butz, David A.
Sibley, Chris G.
Barlow, Fiona Kate
Bitacola, Lisa M.
Christ, Oliver
Khan, Sammyh S.
Leong, Chan-Hoong
Pehrson, Samuel
Srinivasan, Narayanan
Sulz, Aline
Tausch, Nicole
Urbanska, Karolina
Wright, Steven C.
Stichwörter: ATTITUDES; egalitarianism; emotions; INTERGROUP RELATIONS; JUSTICE; national flags; nationalism; NEW-ZEALAND; PATRIOTISM; power; Psychology; Psychology, Social; SOCIAL IDENTITY; SUBLIMINAL EXPOSURE; SYMBOLS; VALUES
Erscheinungsdatum: 2017
Volumen: 48
Ausgabe: 3
Startseite: 335
Seitenende: 352
We examined the concepts and emotions people associate with their national flag, and how these associations are related to nationalism and patriotism across 11 countries. Factor analyses indicated that the structures of associations differed across countries in ways that reflect their idiosyncratic historical developments. Positive emotions and egalitarian concepts were associated with national flags across countries. However, notable differences between countries were found due to historical politics. In societies known for being peaceful and open-minded (e.g., Canada, Scotland), egalitarianism was separable from honor-related concepts and associated with the flag; in countries that were currently involved in struggles for independence (e.g., Scotland) and countries with an imperialist past (the United Kingdom), the flag was strongly associated with power-related concepts; in countries with a negative past (e.g., Germany), the primary association was sports; in countries with disruption due to separatist or extremist movements (e.g., Northern Ireland, Turkey), associations referring to aggression were not fully rejected; in collectivist societies (India, Singapore), obedience was linked to positive associations and strongly associated with the flag. In addition, the more strongly individuals endorsed nationalism and patriotism, the more they associated positive emotions and egalitarian concepts with their flag. Implications of these findings are discussed.
ISSN: 00220221
DOI: 10.1177/0022022116687851

Show full item record

Google ScholarTM