Relational mobility predicts social behaviors in 39 countries and is tied to historical farming and threat

Autor(en): Thomson, Robert
Yuki, Masaki
Talhelm, Thomas
Schug, Joanna
Kito, Mie 
Ayanian, Arin H.
Becker, Julia C.
Becker, Maja
Chiu, Chi-yue
Choi, Hoon-Seok
Ferreira, Carolina M.
Fueloep, Marta
Gul, Pelin
Maria Houghton-Illera, Ana
Joasoo, Mihkel
Jong, Jonathan
Kavanagh, Christopher M.
Khutkyy, Dmytro
Manzi, Claudia
Marcinkowska, Urszula M.
Milfont, Taciano L.
Neto, Felix
von Oertzen, Timo
Pliskin, Ruthie
San Martin, Alvaro
Singh, Purnima
Visserman, Mariko L.
Stichwörter: BIOLOGICAL MARKETS; COMMITMENT; COOPERATION; culture; EMERGENCE; interpersonal relationships; JAPAN; multicountry; Multidisciplinary Sciences; PARTNER CHOICE; PSYCHOLOGY; relational mobility; Science & Technology - Other Topics; SOCIOECOLOGICAL APPROACH; socioecology; TRUST
Erscheinungsdatum: 2018
Herausgeber: NATL ACAD SCIENCES
Journal: PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Volumen: 115
Ausgabe: 29
Startseite: 7521
Seitenende: 7526
Zusammenfassung: 
Biologists and social scientists have long tried to understand why some societies have more fluid and open interpersonal relationships and how those differences influence culture. This study measures relational mobility, a socioecological variable quantifying voluntary (high relational mobility) vs. fixed (low relational mobility) interpersonal relationships. We measure relational mobility in 39 societies and test whether it predicts social behavior. People in societies with higher relational mobility report more proactive interpersonal behaviors (e.g., self-disclosure and social support) and psychological tendencies that help them build and retain relationships (e.g., general trust, intimacy, self-esteem). Finally, we explore ecological factors that could explain relational mobility differences across societies. Relational mobility was lower in societies that practiced settled, interdependent subsistence styles, such as rice farming, and in societies that had stronger ecological and historical threats.
ISSN: 00278424
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1713191115

Zur Langanzeige

Google ScholarTM

Prüfen

Altmetric