Updating and reasoning: Different processes, different models, different functions

Autor(en): Hoerl, Christoph
McCormack, Teresa
Beck, Sarah Ruth
Rafetseder, Eva
Callender, Craig
De Brigard, Felipe
O'Neill, Kevin
De Corte, Benjamin J.
Wasserman, Edward A.
DeNigris, Danielle
Brooks, Patricia J.
Elliott, Mark A.
Gentry, Hunter
Buckner, Cameron
Goulding, Brandon W.
Friedman, Ori
Hamamouche, Karina
Hayman, Genevieve
Huebner, Bryce
Hohenberger, Annette
Isham, Eve A.
Ziskin, Elijah M.
Peterson, Mary A.
Kaufmann, Angelica
Cahen, Arnon
Kelly, Laura
Prabhakar, Janani
Khemlani, Sangeet
Kenward, Ben
Pilling, Michael
Keven, Nazim
Lohse, Karoline
Sixtus, Elena
Lonnemann, Jan
Mahr, Johannes B.
Mayhew, Estelle M. Y.
Zhang, Meng
Hudson, Judith A.
Melnikoff, David E.
Bargh, John A.
Miller, Kristie
Holcombe, Alex O.
Latham, Andrew J.
Montemayor, Carlos
Nuyens, Filip M.
Griffiths, Mark D.
Osvath, Mathias
Kabadayi, Can
Oyserman, Daphna
Dawson, Andrew
Pan, Shen
Carruthers, Peter
Povinelli, Daniel J.
Glorioso, Gabrielle C.
Kuznar, Shannon L.
Pavlic, Mateja
Prosser, Simon
Redshaw, Jonathan
Bulley, Adam
Suddendorf, Thomas
Roselli, Andrea
Tillman, Katharine A.
Ueda, Natsuki
Hanakawa, Takashi
Viera, Gerardo
Margolis, Eric
Stichwörter: Behavioral Sciences; Neurosciences; Neurosciences & Neurology; Psychology; Psychology, Biological
Erscheinungsdatum: 2019
Herausgeber: CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
Journal: BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES
Volumen: 42
Zusammenfassung: 
Two issues should be addressed to refine and extend the distinction between temporal updating and reasoning advocated by Hoerl & McCormack. First, do the mental representations constructed during updating differ from those used for reasoning? Second, are updating and reasoning the only two processes relevant to temporal thinking? If not, is a dual-systems framework sensible? We address both issues below.
ISSN: 0140525X
DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X19000554

Show full item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric