Four years of quality management of dermatologic evaluations for occupational purposes: Report from the ABD clearing institution [Vier jahre qualitätssicherung im hautarztverfahren: Bericht aus der der ABD]

DC ElementWertSprache
dc.contributor.authorJohn, S.M.
dc.contributor.authorDiepgen, T.L.
dc.contributor.authorElsner, P.
dc.contributor.authorKöllner, A.
dc.contributor.authorRichter, G.
dc.contributor.authorRothe, A.
dc.contributor.authorSchindera, I.
dc.contributor.authorStary, A.
dc.contributor.authorWehrmann, W.
dc.contributor.authorSchwanitz, H.J.
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-23T16:28:18Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-23T16:28:18Z-
dc.date.issued2004
dc.identifier.issn16100379
dc.identifier.urihttps://osnascholar.ub.uni-osnabrueck.de/handle/unios/15768-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Expert dermatologic evaluation is the most relevant tool for secondary prevention in occupational dermatology in Germany. If there is a possibility of a work-related skin disorder in an employee, dermatologists may conduct the relevant diagnostic procedures (e.g. patch-and prick-tests, serology) at the expenses of the public employers' liability insurance fund (UVT). Most dermatologists make careful use of this unparalleled privilege, which is also an obligation. However, recently, with an increasing number of dermatologist's reports submitted, there have been occasional complaints by the UVT concerning overly extensive testing. In 1999 the Task Force on Occupational and Environmental Dermatology (ABD) of the German Dermatological Society established a clearing procedure. Two experienced occupational dermatologists will - separately - give their expert opinion on dermatologist's reports which have been forwarded anonymously by the UVT for expert review. Results: Thus far, from May 1999 to May 2003 155 dermatologist's reports have been submitted to the clearing procedure. The complaints were in > 95 % of cases considered justified by the experts. Their criticism was primarily directed towards excessive testing procedures and failure to provide sufficient clinical information. Conclusions: The UVT does not undertake such extensive preventive efforts for any other occupational disease. Therefore, quality management of the dermatologist's procedure - conducted by dermatologists and providing transparency - is essential to maintain and develop this effective tool of secondary prevention for the benefit of workers and employers.
dc.language.isode
dc.relation.ispartofJDDG - Journal of the German Society of Dermatology
dc.subjectcorrelation analysis
dc.subjectdermatology
dc.subjectdiagnostic test
dc.subjectemployer
dc.subjectGermany
dc.subjecthealth insurance
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectinformation processing
dc.subjectmedical liability
dc.subjectmedical society
dc.subjectoccupational health
dc.subjectpatch test
dc.subjectprick test
dc.subjectreview
dc.subjectserology
dc.subjectskin disease
dc.subjectskin examination
dc.subjectskin test
dc.subjectwork environment, Germany
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectOccupational Diseases
dc.subjectQuality Assurance, Health Care
dc.subjectSkin Diseases
dc.subjectTreatment Outcome
dc.titleFour years of quality management of dermatologic evaluations for occupational purposes: Report from the ABD clearing institution [Vier jahre qualitätssicherung im hautarztverfahren: Bericht aus der der ABD]
dc.typereview
dc.identifier.doi10.1046/j.1439-0353.2004.04028.x
dc.identifier.pmid16279239
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-6044273003
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-6044273003&doi=10.1046%2fj.1439-0353.2004.04028.x&partnerID=40&md5=78bb4586c8d16e93f8180b72165a50dd
dc.description.volume2
dc.description.issue8
dc.description.startpage717
dc.description.endpage721
dcterms.isPartOf.abbreviationJDDG J. German Soc. Dermatol.
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-5406-9458-
crisitem.author.netidJoSw269-
Zur Kurzanzeige

Seitenaufrufe

4
Letzte Woche
0
Letzter Monat
0
geprüft am 07.06.2024

Google ScholarTM

Prüfen

Altmetric