Occupational skin diseases knowledge questionnaire [Der Berufsdermatosen-Wissenstest (BWT)]

DC ElementWertSprache
dc.contributor.authorMertin, M.
dc.contributor.authorWulfhorst, B.
dc.contributor.authorJohn, S.M.
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-23T16:29:12Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-23T16:29:12Z-
dc.date.issued2010
dc.identifier.issn1438776X
dc.identifier.urihttps://osnascholar.ub.uni-osnabrueck.de/handle/unios/16100-
dc.description.abstractRecently, cross-linked interdisciplinary prevention concepts have been established including elements from patient education in connection with prevention and rehabilitation of work-related skin diseases. The effectiveness of those concepts has been documented in controlled studies. However, the analyzed outcome-parameters skin condition, skin protection behavior and job-continuation are multi disciplinary and multifactorial results of the interventions. They are potentially influenceable by different confounders and are not suited for controlling and displaying the specific aspects of patient education. Increase in knowledge is seen as a basic precondition for implementing the aims of patient education and is therefore a major component to secure long-term achievements of treatments. So far, there are neither nationally nor internationally validated and standardized instruments for the assessment of disease specific knowledge. The aim of the present study was the development and the validation of an instrument for the assessment of the disease specific knowledge of patients with occupational skin diseases. We focused on the relevance of actions which are relevant for preventing skin diseases. After having developed the test, an accomplishment of a prospective multicentre cross-validation study on n = 532 probands was carried on. The internal consistency for the complete scale of 65 items with α = .907 can be rated as being good. The examination of the construct validity was carried out by a hypotheses checking process. A priori nine hypotheses from the construct or from the results of other test validations were derived and empirically verified. Atotal of seven hypotheses could be verified. The analysis of the sensitivity to change resulted from an examination of 204 health care students. Excellent effect sizes were determined by the pre-post-comparison of the test results. © 2010 Dustri-Verlag Dr. Karl Feistle.
dc.language.isode
dc.publisherDustri-Verlag Dr. Karl Feistle
dc.relation.ispartofDermatologie in Beruf und Umwelt
dc.subjectarticle
dc.subjectclinical assessment
dc.subjectconstruct validity
dc.subjectEducational programme
dc.subjectEvaluation
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjecthypothesis
dc.subjectKnowledge
dc.subjectoccupational skin disease
dc.subjectOccupational skin diseases
dc.subjectpatient education
dc.subjectprofessional knowledge
dc.subjectprospective study
dc.subjectquestionnaire
dc.subjectrating scale
dc.subjectSkin protection
dc.subjectvalidation study
dc.titleOccupational skin diseases knowledge questionnaire [Der Berufsdermatosen-Wissenstest (BWT)]
dc.typejournal article
dc.identifier.doi10.5414/dbp58105
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-78049337331
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-78049337331&doi=10.5414%2fdbp58105&partnerID=40&md5=6854171711a979cb844d0e6c84e0362d
dc.description.volume58
dc.description.issue3
dc.description.startpage105
dc.description.endpage113
dcterms.isPartOf.abbreviationDermatol. Beruf Umwelt
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-5406-9458-
crisitem.author.netidJoSw269-
Zur Kurzanzeige

Seitenaufrufe

4
Letzte Woche
0
Letzter Monat
0
geprüft am 01.06.2024

Google ScholarTM

Prüfen

Altmetric