Semantic benchmarking of process models - An ontology-based approach

Autor(en): Teuteberg, F. 
Kluth, M.
Smolnik, S.
Ahlemann, F.
Stichwörter: Benchmarking; Business process management; Conceptual model; Economic evaluations; Evaluation methodologies; Information services; Information systems; Model analysis; Multi methods; Ontologies; Ontology; Ontology-based; Performance indicators; Problem domain; Process benchmarking; Process model; Process modeling; Qualitative differences; Semantics; Service oriented architecture (SOA); Software prototypes, Enterprise resource management; Software prototyping, Benchmarking
Erscheinungsdatum: 2009
Journal: ICIS 2009 Proceedings - Thirtieth International Conference on Information Systems
Zusammenfassung: 
This article suggests an approach which allows the costly analysis of processes, e.g., in service oriented architectures for benchmarking to be partially automated, so that the performance indicators, as well as qualitative differences between processes become apparent. The approach is based on using appropriate ontologies, which make the process models both syntactically and semantically comparable. In this article, we present a conceptual model for this new approach to process benchmarking, a framework, as well as a software prototype for analyzing and comparing individual process models. We provide an overview of our multi-method evaluation methodology and delineate the technical, conceptual, and economic evaluation perspectives with their respective outcomes. This analysis allowed us to determine whether our approach is generally suitable for generating novel and useful information on different process models that describe the same problem domain.
Beschreibung: 
Conference of 30th International Conference on Information Systems, ICIS 2009 ; Conference Date: 15 December 2009 Through 18 December 2009; Conference Code:93594
Externe URL: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84870967248&partnerID=40&md5=d35989be704ab8fe733035a7bb2f1f66

Zur Langanzeige

Seitenaufrufe

13
Letzte Woche
1
Letzter Monat
4
geprüft am 08.05.2024

Google ScholarTM

Prüfen