Justification for the evaluation of fragrance allergies (allergens of fragrance mix, allergens of fragrance mix II, Lyral®) in the context of the evaluation of the reduction in earning capacity [Begründung für die beurteilung einer duftstoffallergie (allergene des duftstoff-mix, allergene des duftstoff-mix II, Lyral®) im rahmen der MdE-bewertung]

DC ElementWertSprache
dc.contributor.authorSkudlik, C.
dc.contributor.authorJohn, S.M.
dc.contributor.authorBecker, D.
dc.contributor.authorDickel, H.
dc.contributor.authorGeier, J.
dc.contributor.authorLessmann, H.
dc.contributor.authorMahler, V.
dc.contributor.authorRogosky, E.
dc.contributor.authorWagner, E.
dc.contributor.authorWeisshaar, E.
dc.contributor.authorDiepgen, T.L.
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-23T16:29:52Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-23T16:29:52Z-
dc.date.issued2008
dc.identifier.issn1438776X
dc.identifier.urihttps://osnascholar.ub.uni-osnabrueck.de/handle/unios/16397-
dc.description.abstractThe following evidence-based recommendations help to evaluate the effects of an allergy to fragrences with regard to the excluded job possibilities as necessary for the evaluation of the reduction in earning capacity in occupational skin diseases according to BK No. 5101, German regulation for occupational diseases. Regarding their allergen potency, fragrances are very heterogeneous. The following allergens are particularly potent: tree moss extract, oak moss extract, farnesol, hydroxycitronellal, isoeugenol, lyral and cinnamic aldehyde. Alpha-amyl cinnamic alcohol, benzyl cinnamate, citral, citronellol, cumarin, eugenol, geraniol, lilial and cinnamic alcohol were classified as less important allergens. Finally, alpha-amyl cinnamic aldehyde, alpha-hexyl cinnamic aldehyde, anisyl alcohol, benzyl alcohol, benzyl benzoate, linalool, limes, methyl heptine carbonate and methyl ionone were classiefied as substances that rarely cause sensitisation. Although fragrances are ubiquitous, occupation-related allergic contact eczemas caused by fragrances are rare. There is no occupational group in which they play a major role concerning possible allergic contact eczems. The basis to evaluate the reduction in earning capacity in cases of occupation-related Type IV sensitizations against fragrances cannot be a positive reaction to the fragrance mixes alone. In cases of positive reactions to fragrance mixes, an itemization of the single components is mandatory. The prevalence of an allergy to fragrances (allergens of fragrance mix, allergens of fragrance mix II, Lyral®) is scored as mild to moderate, depending on the sensitization intensity. The sensitization against a single fragrance as well as against several fragrances normally justifies the evaluation "mild", in cases of a clinically severe sensitization against one ore more fragrances can result in the evaluation "moderate" effects of allergens. © 2008 Dustri-Verlag Dr. Karl Feistle.
dc.language.isode
dc.publisherDustri-Verlag Dr. Karl Feistle
dc.relation.ispartofDermatologie in Beruf und Umwelt
dc.subjectbenzyl alcohol, 100-51-6
dc.subjectbenzyl benzoate, 120-51-4, 8022-66-0
dc.subjectcalcium oxide, 1305-78-8
dc.subjectcinnamaldehyde, 104-55-2
dc.subjectcinnamic acid, 4151-45-5, 538-42-1, 621-82-9
dc.subjectcinnamyl alcohol, 104-54-1
dc.subjectcitral, 106-26-3, 141-27-5, 5392-40-5
dc.subjectcitronellol, 106-22-9
dc.subjectcoumarin, 91-64-5
dc.subjecteugenol, 97-53-0
dc.subjectfarnesol, 4602-84-0
dc.subjectgeraniol, 106-24-1
dc.subjecthydroxycitronellal, 107-75-5
dc.subjectisoeugenol, 97-54-1
dc.subjectlinalool, 78-70-6
dc.subject4 methoxybenzyl alcohol
dc.subjectalkanol
dc.subjectallergen
dc.subjectAllergic contact dermatitis
dc.subjectalpha amyl cinnamic aldehyde
dc.subjectalpha hexylcinnamaldehyde
dc.subjectbenzyl alcohol
dc.subjectbenzyl benzoate
dc.subjectbeta (4 tert butylphenyl) alpha methylpropionaldehyde
dc.subjectcalcium oxide
dc.subjectcarbonic acid derivative
dc.subjectcinnamaldehyde
dc.subjectcinnamic acid
dc.subjectcinnamic acid benzyl ester
dc.subjectcinnamyl alcohol
dc.subjectcitral
dc.subjectcitronellol
dc.subjectcoumarin
dc.subjectDelayed type allergy
dc.subjecteugenol
dc.subjectevaluation
dc.subjectEvernia prunastri
dc.subjectfarnesol
dc.subjectfragrance
dc.subjectFragrance allergy
dc.subjectgeraniol
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjecthydroxycitronellal
dc.subjectionone derivative
dc.subjectisoeugenol
dc.subjectjob finding
dc.subjectlinalool
dc.subjectmedical assessment
dc.subjectmethyl heptine carbonate
dc.subjectmethyle ionone
dc.subjectmoss
dc.subjectoak
dc.subjectoak moss extract
dc.subjectOccupational dermatology
dc.subjectoccupational eczema
dc.subjectPatch test
dc.subjectplant extract
dc.subjectpractice guideline
dc.subjectprevalence
dc.subjectreview
dc.subjectskin allergy
dc.subjectskin sensitivity
dc.subjecttree moss extract, contact sensitization
dc.subjectworkman compensation
dc.titleJustification for the evaluation of fragrance allergies (allergens of fragrance mix, allergens of fragrance mix II, Lyral®) in the context of the evaluation of the reduction in earning capacity [Begründung für die beurteilung einer duftstoffallergie (allergene des duftstoff-mix, allergene des duftstoff-mix II, Lyral®) im rahmen der MdE-bewertung]
dc.typereview
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-42549119454
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-42549119454&partnerID=40&md5=759cd972d4dd9f8748f8b5a8c7bd5452
dc.description.volume56
dc.description.issue1
dc.description.startpage25
dc.description.endpage30
dcterms.isPartOf.abbreviationDermatol. Beruf Umwelt
crisitem.author.deptUniversität Osnabrück-
crisitem.author.deptUniversität Osnabrück-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-5406-9458-
crisitem.author.netidJoSw269-
Zur Kurzanzeige

Seitenaufrufe

6
Letzte Woche
0
Letzter Monat
0
geprüft am 09.05.2024

Google ScholarTM

Prüfen