Dependencies in business process rule hierarchies

Autor(en): Pulvermuller, E. 
Speck, A.
Feja, S.
Witt, S.
Stichwörter: Business Process; Business process model; Topdown; Validation of business process models; Validation results, Tools
Erscheinungsdatum: 2013
Herausgeber: IEEE Computer Society
Journal: SoMeT 2013 - 12th IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Software Methodologies, Tools and Techniques, Proceedings
Startseite: 203
Seitenende: 207
Zusammenfassung: 
Automated checking concepts for business process models support human testers considerably by saving time. However, this new checking ability results in a comparatively large number of rules representing requirements. But without a comprehensible representation of the relations between the rules on the one hand its hard to keep track on the validated rules and on the other hand to correctly interpret the validation results. In this paper we propose an improvement for the automated validation of business process models by offering elements to create abstract rules and arranging these rules in hierarchies. Top-down and bottom-up testing are supported by stepwise activating (and validating) the rules starting from the top of the hierarchy (or bottom respectively). Moreover, the rule hierarchies may be reused when similar systems are to be validated by configuring a valid rule sub-set for the specific business process system. © 2013 IEEE.
Beschreibung: 
Conference of 12th IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Software Methodologies, Tools and Techniques, SoMeT 2013 ; Conference Date: 22 September 2013 Through 24 September 2013; Conference Code:101427
DOI: 10.1109/SoMeT.2013.6645663
Externe URL: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84898647841&doi=10.1109%2fSoMeT.2013.6645663&partnerID=40&md5=7a459291132b8c4964a83cc35ef78ca6

Zur Langanzeige

Seitenaufrufe

1
Letzte Woche
0
Letzter Monat
0
geprüft am 17.05.2024

Google ScholarTM

Prüfen

Altmetric