The development of mirror self-recognition in different sociocultural contexts.

DC ElementWertSprache
dc.contributor.authorKärtner, J.
dc.contributor.authorKeller, H.
dc.contributor.authorChaudhary, N.
dc.contributor.authorYovsi, R.D.
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-23T16:31:05Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-23T16:31:05Z-
dc.date.issued2012
dc.identifier.issn15405834
dc.identifier.urihttps://osnascholar.ub.uni-osnabrueck.de/handle/unios/16899-
dc.description.abstractThe overarching goal of the present study was to trace the development of mirror self-recognition (MSR), as an index of toddlers' sense of themselves and others as autonomous intentional agents, in different sociocultural environments. A total of 276 toddlers participated in the present study. Toddlers were either 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, or 21 months old at their first assessment and completed weekly MSR assessments over a period of 6 weeks (N = 1,577). The toddlers and their families were from one of four sociocultural contexts: A prototypical autonomous sociocultural context (urban German middle-class families, n = 82), two prototypical relational sociocultural contexts (rural Indian and rural Nso families living in subsistence-based ecologies, n = 54 and n = 80, respectively), or an autonomous-relational sociocultural context (urban Indian middle-class families, n = 60). In line with previous research, we hypothesized that the onset of MSR would be earlier in sociocultural contexts in which mothers value and support their toddlers' development of autonomy. In addition, we considered three factors that covary with culture and that might compromise the cross-cultural validity of MSR as a behavioral measure of toddlers' sense of themselves as independent agents: familiarity with mirrors, culture-specific norms of expressive behavior, and motivation for tactile exploration. Finally, we analyzed toddlers' reactions to their specular image (e.g., pointing, playmate, and experimenting behavior) across time and culture as well as their relation to MSR. The results indicate that MSR increased with age in all sociocultural contexts. In line with our hypotheses, MSR rates were higher in the autonomy-supporting cultural context (urban German, urban Indian) than they were in the relational cultural contexts(rural Indian, rural Nso). The sociocultural differences in MSR could not, however, be explained by differences in mirror familiarity or culture-specific norms of expressive behavior. The cross-cultural validity of MSR as an index of toddlers' sense of themselves as independent agents is further supported by positive associations between MSR and pronoun use in all sociocultural contexts. Cross-cultural variation in MSR could best be explained by caretakers' emphasis on autonomous socialization goals, followed by toddlers' motivation for tactile exploration. These findings enhance our current understanding of development in more general terms by adding one more puzzle piece to the emerging picture of culture-specific developmental pathways. In order to understand developmental processes, one must take into account caretakers' cultural models and exercise caution when generalizing beyond the specific sociocultural context at hand.
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofMonographs of the Society for Research in Child Development
dc.subjectarticle
dc.subjectchild development
dc.subjectcohort analysis
dc.subjectcultural factor
dc.subjectfemale
dc.subjectGermany
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectIndia
dc.subjectinfant
dc.subjectmale
dc.subjectmother child relation
dc.subjectquestionnaire
dc.subjectrecognition
dc.subjectrural population
dc.subjectself concept
dc.subjectsocial class
dc.subjecturban population, Child Development
dc.subjectCohort Studies
dc.subjectCross-Cultural Comparison
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectGermany
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectIndia
dc.subjectInfant
dc.subjectMale
dc.subjectMother-Child Relations
dc.subjectQuestionnaires
dc.subjectRecognition (Psychology)
dc.subjectRural Population
dc.subjectSelf Concept
dc.subjectSocial Class
dc.subjectUrban Population
dc.titleThe development of mirror self-recognition in different sociocultural contexts.
dc.typejournal article
dc.identifier.pmid23153268
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-84875250261
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84875250261&partnerID=40&md5=89b34bac5d97ec07bc7ac037d274e128
dc.description.volume77
dc.description.issue4
dc.description.startpage1
dc.description.endpage87
dcterms.isPartOf.abbreviationMonogr Soc Res Child Dev
crisitem.author.deptFB 08 - Humanwissenschaften-
crisitem.author.deptidfb08-
crisitem.author.parentorgUniversität Osnabrück-
crisitem.author.netidKeHe720-
Zur Kurzanzeige

Seitenaufrufe

6
Letzte Woche
0
Letzter Monat
0
geprüft am 16.05.2024

Google ScholarTM

Prüfen