An argument for an analogical perspective on rationality & decision-making

Autor(en): Besold, T.R.
Gust, H.
Krumnack, U. 
Abdel-Fattah, A.
Schmidt, M.
Kühnberger, K.-U. 
Stichwörter: Analysis and modeling; Background theory; Cognitive mechanisms; Computational model; Human decision-making; Rational behaviours; Rational beliefs, Decision making, Behavioral research
Erscheinungsdatum: 2011
Enthalten in: CEUR Workshop Proceedings
Band: 751
Startseite: 20
Seitenende: 31
Zusammenfassung: 
Humans are without any doubts the prototypical example of agents that can hold rational beliefs and can show rational behaviour. When modeling human decision-making, it seems reasonable to take the remarkable abilities of humans into account with respect to rational behaviour, but also the apparent deficiencies of humans shining up in certain rationality tasks. Based on well-known challenges for human rationality, together with results from psychological studies on decision-making and from the field of computational modeling of analogy making, we argue that analysis and modeling of rational belief and behaviour should also consider cognitive mechanisms like analogy-making and coherence maximization of the background theory.
Beschreibung: 
Conference of Workshop on Reasoning about Other Minds: Logical and Cognitive Perspectives, RAOM 2011 ; Conference Date: 11 July 2011 Through 11 July 2011; Conference Code:101604
ISSN: 16130073
Externe URL: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84856433354&partnerID=40&md5=1051c251d1a2e04d27b9ed2c2307faac

Show full item record

Page view(s)

2
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Jun 25, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check