DC Element | Wert | Sprache |
dc.contributor.author | Varga, S. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-12-23T16:31:20Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-12-23T16:31:20Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 14409917 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://osnascholar.ub.uni-osnabrueck.de/handle/unios/17026 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This article seeks to defend two claims: First, that universalist ethics in Habermas and Rawls cannot function without some recourse to the good Life, or human well-being. Second, that such ethical reflection must involve formal anthropological considerations. In other words, it must involve a consideration of the good that also encompasses reflection on what we are as humans. As an example, the paper draws on Habermas' recent thoughts on "species- ethics". I will argue that "species ethics" needs to be substantiated and expanded with the help of an "anthropology of recognition". © Equinox Publishing Ltd 2011. | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Critical Horizons | |
dc.subject | Axel Honneth" | |
dc.subject | Formal Anthropology" | |
dc.subject | Jürgen Habermas" | |
dc.subject | Species Ethics" | |
dc.title | Habermas' "Species ethics", and the limits of "Formal anthropology" | |
dc.type | journal article | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1558/crit.v12i1.71 | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-79959675438 | |
dc.identifier.url | https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-79959675438&doi=10.1558%2fcrit.v12i1.71&partnerID=40&md5=0b45cbaa1ee4b4c42b6463b3c6969846 | |
dc.description.volume | 12 | |
dc.description.issue | 1 | |
dc.description.startpage | 71 | |
dc.description.endpage | 89 | |
dcterms.isPartOf.abbreviation | Crit. Horiz. | |