Creativity within and outside the linguistic system

DC ElementWertSprache
dc.contributor.authorBergs, A.
dc.contributor.authorKompa, N.A.
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-23T16:34:43Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-23T16:34:43Z-
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn22352066
dc.identifier.urihttps://osnascholar.ub.uni-osnabrueck.de/handle/unios/18182-
dc.description.abstractIn this paper, we distinguish two types of creativity (F-creativity and E-creativity; Sampson 2016) and briefly address the question of language change and linguistic innovation in language acquisition. Cognitively speaking, the two types of creativity may impose different cognitive demands on a speaker. But the most pressing question, from our point of view, is the question whether E-creativity itself is constrained or forces us to 'transcend' the (rules of the) system. We will, eventually, argue that what looks like creative language use (metaphor, coercion, etc.) is still governed by rules (or hypermaxims). True E-creativity would then mean to step outside the system. © 2020 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston 2020.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherDe Gruyter Open Ltd
dc.relation.ispartofCognitive Semiotics
dc.subjectE-creativity
dc.subjectF-creativity
dc.subjectlinguistic rules
dc.titleCreativity within and outside the linguistic system
dc.typereview
dc.identifier.doi10.1515/cogsem-2020-2025
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85101251833
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85101251833&doi=10.1515%2fcogsem-2020-2025&partnerID=40&md5=c6d4451e408c8c426ae3f119e7c30e2e
dc.description.volume13
dc.description.issue1
dcterms.isPartOf.abbreviationCogn. Semiotics
crisitem.author.deptFB 07 - Sprach- und Literaturwissenschaft-
crisitem.author.deptidfb07-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-6328-7745-
crisitem.author.parentorgUniversität Osnabrück-
crisitem.author.netidBeAl083-
Zur Kurzanzeige

Seitenaufrufe

12
Letzte Woche
1
Letzter Monat
0
geprüft am 29.05.2024

Google ScholarTM

Prüfen

Altmetric