Rhythmic Versus Phonemic Interference in Delayed Auditory Feedback
DC Element | Wert | Sprache |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kaspar, Kai | |
dc.contributor.author | Ruebeling, Hartmut | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-12-23T15:57:41Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-12-23T15:57:41Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2011 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 10924388 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://osnascholar.ub.uni-osnabrueck.de/handle/unios/3066 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Purpose: Delayed auditory feedback (DAF) of a speaker's voice disturbs normal speech production. Various traditional theories assume that the content of the delayed feedback signal interferes with the actual production of a particular speech unit (phonemic content hypothesis). The displaced rhythm hypothesis as an alternative explanation suggests that speech disturbances arise from a disruptive rhythm that is produced by the delayed speech signal. The present experimental study directly contrasted the role of rhythm and speech content in a DAF task using speech units as stimuli. Method: One hundred fifty-one participants read aloud 4 different sequences of double syllables that varied in phonemic content and rhythm while auditory feedback was either nondelayed or delayed by 200 or 400 ms. Results: In line with previous studies, the authors found a peak of disturbances at a delay of about 200 ms, independent of speech rate. More important, the present results clearly support the displaced rhythm hypothesis. A speech rate dependency of this effect was also found. Conclusion: Rhythm seems to be a significant criterion of speech monitoring, and hence a mismatch between spoken words and auditory feedback realized by DAF induces obvious speech problems on rhythmic level regardless of phonemic discrepancy at the same time. | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | AMER SPEECH-LANGUAGE-HEARING ASSOC | |
dc.relation.ispartof | JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH | |
dc.subject | Audiology & Speech-Language Pathology | |
dc.subject | CHILDREN | |
dc.subject | CRITICAL INTERVAL | |
dc.subject | delayed auditory feedback | |
dc.subject | displaced rhythm hypothesis | |
dc.subject | Linguistics | |
dc.subject | MUSIC | |
dc.subject | PERFORMANCE | |
dc.subject | phonemic content hypothesis | |
dc.subject | Rehabilitation | |
dc.subject | SPEAKERS | |
dc.subject | SPEECH | |
dc.subject | speech monitoring | |
dc.subject | STUTTER | |
dc.subject | TASKS | |
dc.title | Rhythmic Versus Phonemic Interference in Delayed Auditory Feedback | |
dc.type | journal article | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1044/1092-4388(2010/10-0109) | |
dc.identifier.isi | ISI:000291166100016 | |
dc.description.volume | 54 | |
dc.description.issue | 3 | |
dc.description.startpage | 932 | |
dc.description.endpage | 943 | |
dc.publisher.place | 10801 ROCKVILLE PIKE, ROCKVILLE, MD 20852-3279 USA | |
dcterms.isPartOf.abbreviation | J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. | |
crisitem.author.netid | KaKa001 | - |
Seitenaufrufe
7
Letzte Woche
1
1
Letzter Monat
0
0
geprüft am 29.05.2024