Reductionist Challenges to Explanatory Pluralism: Comment on McCauley

Autor(en): Eronen, Markus I.
Stichwörter: Ethics; Explanatory Pluralism; Levels; McCauley; Neuroscience; Psychology; Psychology, Multidisciplinary; Reduction; Social Sciences - Other Topics
Erscheinungsdatum: 2009
Herausgeber: ROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
Journal: PHILOSOPHICAL PSYCHOLOGY
Volumen: 22
Ausgabe: 5
Startseite: 637
Seitenende: 646
Zusammenfassung: 
In this comment, I first point out some problems in McCauley's defense of the traditional conception of general analytical levels. Then I present certain reductionist arguments against explanatory pluralism that are not based on the New Wave model of intertheoretic reduction, against which McCauley is arguing. Reductionists that are not committed to this model might not have problems incorporating research on long-term diachronic processes in their analyses. In the last part of the paper, I briefly compare Robert N. McCauley's conception of reduction to some other current accounts, highlighting the differences between them.
ISSN: 09515089
DOI: 10.1080/09515080903238898

Show full item record

Page view(s)

1
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on Mar 5, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric