Too Much of a Good Thing? Enhancement and the Burden of Self-Determination

Autor(en): Nagel, Saskia K.
Stichwörter: AUTONOMY; Biomedical Social Sciences; CHOICE; Ethics; Medical Ethics; Neuroenhancement; Psychopharmacology; Social Sciences - Other Topics; Social Sciences, Biomedical; Well-being
Erscheinungsdatum: 2010
Herausgeber: SPRINGER
Volumen: 3
Ausgabe: 2
Startseite: 109
Seitenende: 119
There is a remedy available for many of our ailments: Psychopharmacology promises to alleviate unsatisfying memory, bad moods, and low self-esteem. Bioethicists have long discussed the ethical implications of enhancement interventions. However, they have not considered relevant evidence from psychology and economics. The growth in autonomy in many areas of life is publicized as progress for the individual. However, the broadening of areas at one's disposal together with the increasing individualization of value systems leads to situations in which the range of options asks too much of the individual. I scrutinize whether increased self-determination and unbound possibilities are really in a person's best interests. Evidence from psychology and economics challenges the assumption that unlimited autonomy is best in all cases. The responsibility for autonomous self-formation that comes with possibilities provided by neuro-enhancement developments can be a burden. To guarantee quality of life I suggest a balance of beneficence, support, and respect for autonomy.
ISSN: 18745490
DOI: 10.1007/s12152-010-9072-6

Show full item record

Page view(s)

Last Week
Last month
checked on Feb 24, 2024

Google ScholarTM