Double standards in body evaluation? The influence of identification with body stimuli on ratings of attractiveness, body fat, and muscle mass

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorVoges, Mona M.
dc.contributor.authorGiabbiconi, Claire-Marie
dc.contributor.authorSchöne, Benjamin
dc.contributor.authorWaldorf, Manuel
dc.contributor.authorHartmann, Andrea S.
dc.contributor.authorVocks, Silja
dc.date.accessioned2022-04-06T11:05:58Z-
dc.date.available2022-04-06T11:05:58Z-
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.urihttps://osnascholar.ub.uni-osnabrueck.de/handle/unios/44555-
dc.description.abstractAlthough it is well documented that women evaluate their own body differently from other bodies, it remains unclear whether this discrepancy is based on double standards because of identity or on objective differences between these bodies. The aim of this study was therefore to test whether women apply double standards depending on a body's identity when evaluating the same bodies presented with different faces. Average-weight women (N = 104) rated body attractiveness, body fat, and muscle mass of thin, average-weight, overweight, athletic, and hypermuscular bodies with either another female's face or their own face. With their own face, subjects rated overweight bodies as more unattractive, higher in body fat and lower in muscle mass than with another female's face. However, for non-overweight bodies, body ratings did not differ depending on body identity. Based on the self-deprecating double standards for overweight bodies, a body-related identity bias might be considered in theoretical models of body image.Level of evidence Level V, descriptive study.
dc.language.isoen
dc.relation.ispartofEating and Weight Disorders
dc.sourcePubMed
dc.subjectYoung Adult
dc.subjectSelf Concept
dc.subjectAttitude
dc.subjectBody image
dc.subjectHumans
dc.subjectAdolescent
dc.subjectAdult
dc.subjectFemale
dc.subjectMuscle, Skeletal
dc.subjectAdipose Tissue
dc.subjectOverweight
dc.titleDouble standards in body evaluation? The influence of identification with body stimuli on ratings of attractiveness, body fat, and muscle mass
dc.typejournal article
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s40519-017-0450-5
dc.identifier.pmid29058270
dc.contributor.affiliationDepartment of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Osnabrück University, Knollstraße 15, 49069, Osnabrück, Germany. mona.voges@uni-osnabrueck.de. Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Osnabrück University, Knollstraße 15, 49069, Osnabrück, Germany. Department of Experimental Psychology I, Osnabrück University, Seminarstraße 20, 49074, Osnabrück, Germany. Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Osnabrück University, Knollstraße 15, 49069, Osnabrück, Germany. Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Osnabrück University, Knollstraße 15, 49069, Osnabrück, Germany. Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Osnabrück University, Knollstraße 15, 49069, Osnabrück, Germany.
dc.description.volume24
dc.description.issue6
dc.description.startpage1173
dc.description.endpage1180
local.import.remainsU3 : Journal Article
local.import.sourcefile./Hartmann_Andrea S_sk_Citavi_20220107.ris
crisitem.author.deptFB 08 - Humanwissenschaften-
crisitem.author.deptFB 08 - Humanwissenschaften-
crisitem.author.deptidfb08-
crisitem.author.deptidfb08-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-7366-679X-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-8498-9466-
crisitem.author.parentorgUniversität Osnabrück-
crisitem.author.parentorgUniversität Osnabrück-
crisitem.author.netidWaMa487-
crisitem.author.netidHaAn413-
crisitem.author.netidVoSi856-
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

19
Last Week
2
Last month
1
checked on Sep 20, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric