Gender Differences in Body Evaluation: Do Men Show More Self-Serving Double Standards Than Women?

DC ElementWertSprache
dc.contributor.authorVoges, Mona M.
dc.contributor.authorGiabbiconi, Claire-Marie
dc.contributor.authorSchoene, Benjamin
dc.contributor.authorWaldorf, Manuel
dc.contributor.authorHartmann, Andrea S.
dc.contributor.authorVocks, Silja
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-23T16:04:40Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-23T16:04:40Z-
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.issn16641078
dc.identifier.urihttps://osnascholar.ub.uni-osnabrueck.de/handle/unios/6548-
dc.description.abstractGenerally speaking, compared to women, men are less dissatisfied with their own body and consider themselves to be better-looking and less overweight. So far, however, it is unclear whether these divergent body ratings arise from the application of double standards. With the present study, we examined whether men apply different standards to their own body than to other men's bodies and whether they differ from women in this regard. To this aim, we presented n = 104 women and n = 93 men with pictures of thin, average-weight, overweight, athletic and hypermuscular male and female bodies on a computer screen. To manipulate identification, we showed the bodies of the respective participant's gender once with the participant's own face and once with the face of another person. Identity cues, such as faces, might activate different body schemata, which influence body ratings and thus lead to the application of double standards. Participants were instructed to rate their emotional reaction to the bodies according to valence and arousal, and to rate the bodies with respect to attractiveness, body fat, and muscle mass. The application of double standards was determined by calculating the difference between the rating of a body presented with the participant's face and the rating of the same body presented with another person's face. Both women and men showed self-deprecating double standards in valence, body attractiveness, body fat and muscle mass for the overweight body. Men also revealed self-deprecating double standards for the thin, average-weight and hypermuscular bodies, but evaluated the athletic body as more attractive and with a higher positive feeling when it was presented with their own face. Women did not show any self-serving double standards and showed fewer self-deprecating double standards than men. The results indicate that men devalue non-ideal bodies and upvalue ideal bodies when they are self-related, whereas women more rate in a fair-minded manner. Thus, in contrast to women, an advantage for men may be that they are able to self-enhance in the case of desirable bodies. This ability to self-enhance regarding desirable features might be beneficial for men's self-worth and body satisfaction.
dc.description.sponsorshipDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG)German Research Foundation (DFG); Open Access Publishing Fund of Osnabruck University; The authors declare that they obtained no funding for the conduct of the study. We acknowledge support by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG) and Open Access Publishing Fund of Osnabruck University for the publication of the article.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherFRONTIERS MEDIA SA
dc.relation.ispartofFRONTIERS IN PSYCHOLOGY
dc.subjectbody evaluation
dc.subjectDISSATISFACTION
dc.subjectdouble standards
dc.subjectEXPOSURE
dc.subjectgender difference
dc.subjectIDEAL
dc.subjectIMAGE
dc.subjectINTERNALIZATION
dc.subjectLIFE-SPAN
dc.subjectMASS INDEX
dc.subjectmen
dc.subjectNORMS
dc.subjectPsychology
dc.subjectPsychology, Multidisciplinary
dc.subjectQUESTIONNAIRE EDE-Q
dc.subjectwomen
dc.subjectYOUNG
dc.titleGender Differences in Body Evaluation: Do Men Show More Self-Serving Double Standards Than Women?
dc.typejournal article
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00544
dc.identifier.isiISI:000460906600001
dc.description.volume10
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-6251-3763
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-8498-9466
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-7366-679X
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-7926-7426
dc.contributor.researcheridAAY-7165-2020
dc.contributor.researcheridT-8764-2018
dc.contributor.researcheridQ-9356-2016
dc.publisher.placeAVENUE DU TRIBUNAL FEDERAL 34, LAUSANNE, CH-1015, SWITZERLAND
dcterms.isPartOf.abbreviationFront. Psychol.
dcterms.oaStatusGreen Published, gold
crisitem.author.deptFB 08 - Humanwissenschaften-
crisitem.author.deptFB 08 - Humanwissenschaften-
crisitem.author.deptidfb08-
crisitem.author.deptidfb08-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-7366-679X-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0001-8498-9466-
crisitem.author.parentorgUniversität Osnabrück-
crisitem.author.parentorgUniversität Osnabrück-
crisitem.author.netidWaMa487-
crisitem.author.netidHaAn413-
crisitem.author.netidVoSi856-
Zur Kurzanzeige

Seitenaufrufe

1
Letzte Woche
0
Letzter Monat
0
geprüft am 01.06.2024

Google ScholarTM

Prüfen

Altmetric