European patch test results with audit allergens as candidates for inclusion in the European Baseline Series, 2019/20: Joint results of the ESSCA(A) and the EBSB working groups of the ESCD, and the GEIDAC(C)
Autor(en): | Uter, Wolfgang Wilkinson, S. Mark Aerts, Olivier Bauer, Andrea Borrego, Leopoldo Buhl, Timo Cooper, Susan M. Dickel, Heinrich Gallo, Rosella Gimenez-Arnau, Ana M. John, Swen M. Navarini, Alexander A. Pesonen, Maria Ponyai, Gyorgyi Rustemeyer, Thomas Schliemann, Sibylle Schubert, Steffen Schuttelaar, Marie-Louise A. Valiukeviciene, Skaidra Wagner, Nicola Weisshaar, Elke Goncalo, Margarida ESSCA Working Grp EBS ESCD Working Grp GEIDAC |
Stichwörter: | Allergy; baseline series; benzisothiazolinone; clinical epidemiology; contact allergy; CONTACT SENSITIZATION; decyl glucoside; Dermatology; LIMONENE; LINALOOL HYDROPEROXIDES; MIX; patch testing; RRID; SCR_001905; sodium metabisulfite; surveillance | Erscheinungsdatum: | 2022 | Herausgeber: | WILEY | Enthalten in: | CONTACT DERMATITIS | Band: | 86 | Ausgabe: | 5 | Startseite: | 379 | Seitenende: | 389 | Zusammenfassung: | Background In 2019, a number of allergens (haptens), henceforth, ``the audit allergens,'' were considered as potential additions to the European Baseline Series (EBS), namely, sodium metabisulfite, 2-bromo-2-nitropropane-1,3-diol, diazolidinyl urea, imidazolidinyl urea, Compositae mix II (2.5% or 5% pet), linalool hydroperoxides (lin-OOH), limonene hydroperoxides (lim-OOH), benzisothiazolinone (BIT), octylisothiazolinone (OIT), decyl glucoside, and lauryl glucoside; Evernia furfuracea (tree moss), was additionally tested by some departments as well. Objectives To collect further data on patch test reactivity and clinical relevance of the audit allergens in consecutive patients across Europe. Methods Patch test data covering the audit allergens in 2019 and 2020 were collected by those departments of the European Surveillance System on Contact Allergies testing these, as well as further collaborators from the EBS working group of the European Society of Contact Dermatitis (ESCD), and the Spanish Grupo Espanol de Investigacion en Dermatitis de Contacto y Alergia Cutanea. As patch test outcome, reactions between day (D) 3 and D5 were considered. Results Altogether n = 12 403 patients were tested with any of the audit allergen. Positive reactions were most common to lin-OOH 1% pet. (8.74% [95%CI: 8.14-9.37%]), followed by lin-OOH 0.5% pet., and lim-OOH 0.3% pet (5.41% [95% CI: 4.95-5.89%]). Beyond these terpene hydroperoxides, BIT 0.1% pet. was the second most common allergen with 4.72% (95% CI: 4.2-5.28%), followed by sodium metabisulfite 1% pet. (3.75% [95%CI: 3.32-4.23%]) and Compositae mix 5% pet. (2.31% [95% CI: 1.84-2.87%]). For some allergens, clinical relevance was frequently difficult to ascertain. Conclusions Despite many positive patch test reactions, it remains controversial whether lin- and lim-OOH should be tested routinely, while at least the two preservatives BIT and sodium metabisulfite appear suitable. The present results are a basis for further discussion and ultimately decision on their implementation into routine testing among the ESCD members. |
ISSN: | 0105-1873 | DOI: | 10.1111/cod.14059 |
Show full item record