What should be considered during epicutaneous patch testing?

DC ElementWertSprache
dc.contributor.authorBrans, Richard
dc.contributor.authorMahler, Vera
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-12T06:59:20Z-
dc.date.available2023-07-12T06:59:20Z-
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn2197-0378
dc.identifier.urihttp://osnascholar.ub.uni-osnabrueck.de/handle/unios/72044-
dc.descriptionCited by: 0; All Open Access, Hybrid Gold Open Access
dc.description.abstractIndications for epicutaneous patch testing include the detection or exclusion of allergic contact dermatitis of the skin, transitional mucosa or oral mucosa, suspected delayed-type immune reactions to ingredients of implants, and certain drug reactions (maculopapular exanthema, symmetrical drug-related intertriginous and flexural exanthema [SDRIFE], acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis [AGEP], and fixed drug eruption). When available, allergen preparations that have been pharmaceutically tested and that are approved or marketable as medicinal products should be used. Existing diagnostic gaps can be closed by testing the patient's own materials in asuitable preparation. Interferences of ultraviolet (UV) light exposure or drugs with patch test reactions have to be considered. In addition to the reading after 48 h and 72 h, afurther reading between day7 (168 h) and day10 (240 h) is useful, since about 15% of the positive test reactions remain undetected without this late reading. All positive patch test reactions considered allergic must be evaluated with regard to their clinical relevance based on existing exposures. © 2023, The Author(s).
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer Medizin
dc.relation.ispartofAllergo Journal International
dc.subjectallergen
dc.subjectAllergic contact dermatitis
dc.subjectantihistaminic agent
dc.subjectbenzoyl peroxide
dc.subjectchild
dc.subjectchlorhexidine
dc.subjectchloroacetamide
dc.subjectContact allergy
dc.subjectcontact dermatitis
dc.subjectcorticosteroid
dc.subjectdrug competition
dc.subjectDrug interference
dc.subjectdupilumab
dc.subjecterythema
dc.subjectformaldehyde
dc.subjectglucocorticoid
dc.subjecthuman
dc.subjectimmunity
dc.subjectimmunosuppressive treatment
dc.subjectlight exposure
dc.subjectmaculopapular rash
dc.subjectmercaptobenzothiazole
dc.subjectneomycin
dc.subjectpatch test
dc.subjectpovidone iodine
dc.subjectprednisolone
dc.subjectProblem allergen
dc.subjectpropylene glycol
dc.subjectpruritus
dc.subjectrash
dc.subjectRelevance
dc.subjectReview
dc.subjectskin biopsy
dc.subjectskin defect
dc.subjectskin irritation
dc.subjectskin manifestation
dc.subjecttriethanolamine
dc.subjectultraviolet radiation
dc.subjectvaccination
dc.titleWhat should be considered during epicutaneous patch testing?
dc.typereview
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s40629-023-00243-y
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85147308400
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85147308400&doi=10.1007%2fs40629-023-00243-y&partnerID=40&md5=80596dfcb8a8b1b6f6442245977f046a
dc.description.volume32
dc.description.issue3
dc.description.startpage77 – 82
dcterms.isPartOf.abbreviationAllergo J. Int.
local.import.remainsaffiliations : Department of Dermatology, Environmental Medicine and Health Theory, University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Germany; Institute for interdisciplinary Dermatological Prevention and Rehabilitation (iDerm), University of Osnabrück, Am Finkenhügel 7a, Osnabrück, 49076, Germany; Allergology Division, Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Langen, Germany
local.import.remainscorrespondence_address : R. Brans; Institute for interdisciplinary Dermatological Prevention and Rehabilitation (iDerm), University of Osnabrück, Osnabrück, Am Finkenhügel 7a, 49076, Germany; email: rbrans@uos.de
local.import.remainspublication_stage : Final
crisitem.author.deptUniversität Osnabrück-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-1245-024X-
Zur Kurzanzeige

Seitenaufrufe

2
Letzte Woche
0
Letzter Monat
0
geprüft am 01.06.2024

Google ScholarTM

Prüfen

Altmetric