Contact allergy to ingredients of hair cosmetics in female hairdressers and female consumers—An update based on IVDK data 2013–2020

DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorUter, Wolfgang
dc.contributor.authorHallmann, Sarah
dc.contributor.authorGefeller, Olaf
dc.contributor.authorBrans, Richard
dc.contributor.authorSymanzik, Cara
dc.contributor.authorOppel, Eva
dc.contributor.authorLang, Claudia
dc.contributor.authorKränke, Birger
dc.contributor.authorTreudler, Regina
dc.contributor.authorGeier, Johannes
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-12T06:59:26Z-
dc.date.available2023-07-12T06:59:26Z-
dc.date.issued2023
dc.identifier.issn0105-1873
dc.identifier.urihttp://osnascholar.ub.uni-osnabrueck.de/handle/unios/72079-
dc.descriptionCited by: 1; All Open Access, Hybrid Gold Open Access
dc.description.abstractBackground: Hair cosmetic products contain several, partly potent contact allergens, including excipients like preservatives. Hand dermatitis in hairdressers is common, scalp and face dermatitis in clients or self-users (summarised here as ‘consumers') may be severe. Objective: To compare frequencies of sensitization to hair cosmetic ingredients and other selected allergens between female patch tested patients working as hairdressers and consumers without professional background, respectively, who were tested for suspected allergic contact dermatitis to such products. Methods: Patch test and clinical data collected by the IVDK (https://www.ivdk.org) between 01/2013 and 12/2020 were descriptively analysed, focusing on age-adjusted sensitization prevalences in the two subgroups. Results: Amongst the 920 hairdressers (median age: 28 years, 84% hand dermatitis) and 2321 consumers (median age: 49 years, 71.8% head/face dermatitis), sensitization to p-phenylenediamine (age-standardised prevalence: 19.7% and 31.6%, respectively) and toluene-2,5-diamine (20 and 30.8%) were most common. Contact allergy to other oxidative hair dye ingredients was also more commonly diagnosed in consumers, whereas ammonium persulphate (14.4% vs. 2.3%) and glyceryl thioglycolate (3.9 vs. 1.2%) as well as most notably methylisothiazolinone (10.5% vs. 3.1%) were more frequent allergens in hairdressers. Conclusions: Hair dyes were the most frequent sensitizers both in hairdressers and in consumers; however, as indication for patch testing may differ, prevalences cannot directly be compared. The importance of hair dye allergy is evident, often with marked coupled reactivity. Workplace and product safety need to be further improved. © 2023 The Authors. Contact Dermatitis published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherJohn Wiley and Sons Inc
dc.relation.ispartofContact Dermatitis
dc.subjectclinical epidemiology
dc.subjectcontact allergy
dc.subjecthair cosmetics
dc.subjecthairdressers
dc.subjectRRID:SCR_001905
dc.subjectsurveillance
dc.titleContact allergy to ingredients of hair cosmetics in female hairdressers and female consumers—An update based on IVDK data 2013–2020
dc.typejournal article
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/cod.14363
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85152388293
dc.identifier.urlhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85152388293&doi=10.1111%2fcod.14363&partnerID=40&md5=1d53eb4a38c249dab977aa16be99a1d2
dcterms.isPartOf.abbreviationContact Dermatitis
local.import.remainsaffiliations : Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, University of Erlangen/Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany; Institute for Interdisciplinary Dermatologic Prevention and Rehabilitation (iDerm), Osnabrück University, Osnabrück, Germany; Department of Dermatology, Environmental Medicine and Health Theory, Osnabrück University, Osnabrück, Germany; Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Hospital, Munich, Germany; Allergy Unit, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland; Department of Dermatology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria; Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology and Leipzig Interdisciplinary Center of Allergology (LICA) Comprehensive Allergy Center, University Leipzig Medical Faculty, Leipzig, Germany; Information Network of Departments of Dermatology, University Medical Center, Göttingen, Germany
local.import.remainscorrespondence_address : W. Uter; Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Waldstr. 4-6, D-91054, Germany; email: wolfgang.uter@fau.de
local.import.remainspublication_stage : Article in press
crisitem.author.deptUniversität Osnabrück-
crisitem.author.orcid0000-0002-1245-024X-
Show simple item record

Page view(s)

3
Last Week
0
Last month
0
checked on May 18, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric