Bayesian Alternation during Tactile Augmentation

Autor(en): Goeke, Caspar M.
Planera, Serena
Finger, Holger
Koenig, Peter 
Stichwörter: Bayesian alternation; Behavioral Sciences; CHILDREN; CUE INTEGRATION; DISCRIMINATION TASK; EXPERIENCE; INFORMATION; multimodal integration; MULTISENSORY INTEGRATION; Neurosciences; Neurosciences & Neurology; PERFORMANCE; sensory augmentation; subjective uncertainty; SUBSTITUTION; tactile stimulation; TEXTURE; vestibular system; VISION
Erscheinungsdatum: 2016
Volumen: 10
A large number of studies suggest that the integration of multisensory signals by humans is well-described by Bayesian principles. However, there are very few reports about cue combination between a native and an augmented sense. In particular, we asked the question whether adult participants are able to integrate an augmented sensory cue with existing native sensory information. Hence for the purpose of this study, we build a tactile augmentation device. Consequently, we compared different hypotheses of how untrained adult participants combine information from a native and an augmented sense. In a two-interval forced choice (2 IFC) task, while subjects were blindfolded and seated on a rotating platform, our sensory augmentation device translated information on whole body yaw rotation to tactile stimulation. Three conditions were realized: tactile stimulation only (augmented condition), rotation only (native condition), and both augmented and native information (bimodal condition). Participants had to choose one out of two consecutive rotations with higher angular rotation. For the analysis, we fitted the participants' responses with a probit model and calculated the just notable difference (JND). Then, we compared several models for predicting bimodal from unimodal responses. An objective Bayesian alternation model yielded a better prediction (chi red(2) = 1.67) than the Bayesian integration model (chi red(2) = 4.34). Slightly higher accuracy showed a non-Bayesian winner takes all (WTA) model (chi red(2) = 1.64), which either used only native or only augmented values per subject for prediction. However, the performance of the Bayesian alternation model could be substantially improved (chi red(2) = 1.09) utilizing subjective weights obtained by a questionnaire. As a result, the subjective Bayesian alternation model predicted bimodal performance most accurately among all tested models. These results suggest that information from augmented and existing sensory modalities in untrained humans is combined via a subjective Bayesian alternation process. Therefore, we conclude that behavior in our bimodal condition is explained better by top down-subjective weighting than by bottom-up weighting based upon objective cue reliability.
ISSN: 16625153
DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2016.00187

Show full item record

Page view(s)

Last Week
Last month
checked on Feb 23, 2024

Google ScholarTM