Positional biases in predictive processing of intonation

DC ElementWertSprache
dc.contributor.authorRoettger, Timo B.
dc.contributor.authorFranke, Michael
dc.contributor.authorCole, Jennifer
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-23T16:09:44Z-
dc.date.available2021-12-23T16:09:44Z-
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.issn23273798
dc.identifier.urihttps://osnascholar.ub.uni-osnabrueck.de/handle/unios/8964-
dc.description.abstractReal-time speech comprehension is challenging because communicatively relevant information is distributed throughout the entire utterance. In five mouse tracking experiments on German and American English, we probe if listeners, in principle, use non-local, early intonational information to anticipate upcoming referents. Listeners had to select a speaker-intended referent with their mouse guided by intonational cues, allowing them to anticipate their decision by moving their hand toward the referent prior to lexical disambiguation. While German listeners (Exps. 1-3) seemed to ignore early pitch cues, American English listeners (Exps. 4-5) were in principle able to use these early pitch cues to anticipate upcoming referents. However, many listeners showed no indication of doing so. These results suggest that there are important positional asymmetries in the way intonational information is integrated, with early information being paid less attention to than later cues in the utterance. Open data, scripts, and materials can be retrieved here: .
dc.description.sponsorship``Zukunftskonzept'' of the University of Cologne; Priority Program XPrag.de (DFG)German Research Foundation (DFG) [Schwerpunktprogramm 1727]; Timo Roettger's work was supported by the ``Zukunftskonzept'' of the University of Cologne as part of the Excellence Initiative. Michael Franke's work was supported by the Priority Program XPrag.de (DFG Schwerpunktprogramm 1727). We would like to thank Nastassja Bremer and Kim Rimland for their help during data collection, as well as three anonymous reviewers, and the editor for their insightful comments and suggestions. All remaining errors are our own. Author contribution according to CRediT: TBR: Conceptualisation, Methodology, Resources, Data Curation, Writing -Original Draft, Writing Review & Editing, Visualisation, Supervision, Project administration, Funding acquisition. MF: Conceptualisation, Methodology, Writing - Review & Editing. JC: Conceptualisation, Resources, Writing -Review & Editing, Supervision, Funding acquisition.
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherROUTLEDGE JOURNALS, TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
dc.relation.ispartofLANGUAGE COGNITION AND NEUROSCIENCE
dc.subjectAudiology & Speech-Language Pathology
dc.subjectBehavioral Sciences
dc.subjectintonation
dc.subjectLinguistics
dc.subjectmouse tracking
dc.subjectProsody
dc.subjectPsychology
dc.subjectPsychology, Experimental
dc.subjectrational analysis
dc.subjectsentence comprehension
dc.titlePositional biases in predictive processing of intonation
dc.typejournal article
dc.identifier.doi10.1080/23273798.2020.1853185
dc.identifier.isiISI:000597746600001
dc.description.volume36
dc.description.issue3
dc.description.startpage342
dc.description.endpage370
dc.identifier.eissn23273801
dc.publisher.place2-4 PARK SQUARE, MILTON PARK, ABINGDON OX14 4RN, OXON, ENGLAND
dcterms.isPartOf.abbreviationLang. Cogn. Neurosci.
dcterms.oaStatusGreen Submitted
crisitem.author.deptInstitut für Kognitionswissenschaft-
crisitem.author.deptidinstitute28-
crisitem.author.parentorgFB 08 - Humanwissenschaften-
crisitem.author.grandparentorgUniversität Osnabrück-
crisitem.author.netidFrMi883-
Zur Kurzanzeige

Seitenaufrufe

2
Letzte Woche
0
Letzter Monat
0
geprüft am 06.06.2024

Google ScholarTM

Prüfen

Altmetric