Beyond Allyship: Motivations for Advantaged Group Members to Engage in Action for Disadvantaged Groups

Autor(en): Radke, Helena R. M.
Kutlaca, Maja
Siem, Birte
Wright, Stephen C.
Becker, Julia C.
Stichwörter: ACTION TENDENCIES; allies; AMBIVALENT SEXISM; COLLECTIVE ACTION; GROUP-BASED GUILT; HELPING-BEHAVIOR; IDENTITY-MODEL; motivations; PRIVILEGE AWARENESS; protest; Psychology; Psychology, Social; SELF-CATEGORIZATION; social change; SOCIAL-DOMINANCE ORIENTATION; STATUS STABILITY
Erscheinungsdatum: 2020
Herausgeber: SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
Journal: PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW
Volumen: 24
Ausgabe: 4
Startseite: 291
Seitenende: 315
Zusammenfassung: 
White Americans who participate in the Black Lives Matter movement, men who attended the Women's March, and people from the Global North who work to reduce poverty in the Global South-advantaged group members (sometimes referred to as allies) often engage in action for disadvantaged groups. Tensions can arise, however, over the inclusion of advantaged group members in these movements, which we argue can partly be explained by their motivations to participate. We propose that advantaged group members can be motivated to participate in these movements (a) to improve the status of the disadvantaged group, (b) on the condition that the status of their own group is maintained, (c) to meet their own personal needs, and (d) because this behavior aligns with their moral beliefs. We identify potential antecedents and behavioral outcomes associated with these motivations before describing the theoretical contribution our article makes to the psychological literature.
ISSN: 10888683
DOI: 10.1177/1088868320918698

Zur Langanzeige

Seitenaufrufe

4
Letzte Woche
0
Letzter Monat
0
geprüft am 17.05.2024

Google ScholarTM

Prüfen

Altmetric