Occupational skin diseases knowledge questionnaire [Der Berufsdermatosen-Wissenstest (BWT)]

Autor(en): Mertin, M.
Wulfhorst, B.
John, S.M. 
Stichwörter: article; clinical assessment; construct validity; Educational programme; Evaluation; human; hypothesis; Knowledge; occupational skin disease; Occupational skin diseases; patient education; professional knowledge; prospective study; questionnaire; rating scale; Skin protection; validation study
Erscheinungsdatum: 2010
Herausgeber: Dustri-Verlag Dr. Karl Feistle
Journal: Dermatologie in Beruf und Umwelt
Volumen: 58
Ausgabe: 3
Startseite: 105
Seitenende: 113
Zusammenfassung: 
Recently, cross-linked interdisciplinary prevention concepts have been established including elements from patient education in connection with prevention and rehabilitation of work-related skin diseases. The effectiveness of those concepts has been documented in controlled studies. However, the analyzed outcome-parameters skin condition, skin protection behavior and job-continuation are multi disciplinary and multifactorial results of the interventions. They are potentially influenceable by different confounders and are not suited for controlling and displaying the specific aspects of patient education. Increase in knowledge is seen as a basic precondition for implementing the aims of patient education and is therefore a major component to secure long-term achievements of treatments. So far, there are neither nationally nor internationally validated and standardized instruments for the assessment of disease specific knowledge. The aim of the present study was the development and the validation of an instrument for the assessment of the disease specific knowledge of patients with occupational skin diseases. We focused on the relevance of actions which are relevant for preventing skin diseases. After having developed the test, an accomplishment of a prospective multicentre cross-validation study on n = 532 probands was carried on. The internal consistency for the complete scale of 65 items with α = .907 can be rated as being good. The examination of the construct validity was carried out by a hypotheses checking process. A priori nine hypotheses from the construct or from the results of other test validations were derived and empirically verified. Atotal of seven hypotheses could be verified. The analysis of the sensitivity to change resulted from an examination of 204 health care students. Excellent effect sizes were determined by the pre-post-comparison of the test results. © 2010 Dustri-Verlag Dr. Karl Feistle.
ISSN: 1438776X
DOI: 10.5414/dbp58105
Externe URL: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-78049337331&doi=10.5414%2fdbp58105&partnerID=40&md5=6854171711a979cb844d0e6c84e0362d

Zur Langanzeige

Seitenaufrufe

4
Letzte Woche
0
Letzter Monat
0
geprüft am 17.05.2024

Google ScholarTM

Prüfen

Altmetric