Disclosure of sensitive behaviors across self-administered survey modes: a meta-analysis

Autor(en): Gnambs, Timo
Kaspar, Kai 
Stichwörter: Computer; DATA-COLLECTION MODE; DRUG-USE DATA; FILE-DRAWER PROBLEM; INTERNET IDENTIFICATION; PAPER-AND-PENCIL; Psychology; Psychology, Experimental; Psychology, Mathematical; PUBLICATION BIAS; RISK BEHAVIOR; Self-disclosure; Sensitive question; SEXUAL-BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL DESIRABILITY BIAS; SUBSTANCE USE; Survey
Erscheinungsdatum: 2015
Herausgeber: SPRINGER
Journal: BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS
Volumen: 47
Ausgabe: 4
Startseite: 1237
Seitenende: 1259
Zusammenfassung: 
In surveys, individuals tend to misreport behaviors that are in contrast to prevalent social norms or regulations. Several design features of the survey procedure have been suggested to counteract this problem; particularly, computerized surveys are supposed to elicit more truthful responding. This assumption was tested in a meta-analysis of survey experiments reporting 460 effect sizes (total N = 125,672). Self-reported prevalence rates of several sensitive behaviors for which motivated misreporting has been frequently observed were compared across self-administered paper-and-pencil versus computerized surveys. The results revealed that computerized surveys led to significantly more reporting of socially undesirable behaviors than comparable surveys administered on paper. This effect was strongest for highly sensitive behaviors and surveys administered individually to respondents. Moderator analyses did not identify interviewer effects or benefits of audio-enhanced computer surveys. The meta-analysis highlighted the advantages of computerized survey modes for the assessment of sensitive topics.
ISSN: 1554351X
DOI: 10.3758/s13428-014-0533-4

Show full item record

Page view(s)

2
Last Week
0
Last month
1
checked on Feb 21, 2024

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric