Advantaged- and disadvantaged-group members have motivations similar to those of defenders and attackers, but their psychological characteristics are fundamentally different
Autor(en): | Shnabel, Nurit Becker, Julia |
Stichwörter: | Behavioral Sciences; Neurosciences; Neurosciences & Neurology; Psychology; Psychology, Biological | Erscheinungsdatum: | 2019 | Herausgeber: | CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS | Journal: | BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES | Volumen: | 42 | Zusammenfassung: | Modern societies are characterized by group-based hierarchies. Similar to attackers, disadvantaged-group members wish to change the status quo; like defenders, advantaged-group members wish to protect it. However, the psychological arrays that are typical of disadvantaged-and advantaged-group members are opposite to those of attackers and defenders - suggesting that the Attacker-Defender Game does not capture the dynamics between advantaged and disadvantaged groups. |
ISSN: | 0140525X | DOI: | 10.1017/S0140525X19000736 |
Zur Langanzeige
Seitenaufrufe
19
Letzte Woche
0
0
Letzter Monat
1
1
geprüft am 06.05.2024